AEON Law logo

p: 206.217.2200  |  e: info@aeonlaw.com

  • Home
  • Philosophy
  • Attorneys
    • Adam L.K. Philipp
    • Kyle Flindt
    • Chad Kirby
    • Martin Garthwaite
  • Practice
    • Patents
    • Copyrights
    • Trademarks
    • Trade Secrets
    • IP Transactions
  • Blog
  • News
    • Firm News
    • Publications
  • Contact Us
    • Directions
    • Online Payment
    • Referrals
    • Careers

35 U.S.C. § 287

One of the hidden (literally!) values of method claims

by Adam Philipp on March 18, 2009

Yesterday, the Federal Circuit reminded us of another reason why method claims can be so valuable. In Crown Packaging Technology, Inc. v. Rexam Beverage Can Co., No. 08-1284 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 17. 2009), the court held, among other things, that a method claim does not require markings to enforce the patent in litigation.

Read the full article →

Post to Twitter Post to Facebook Post to LinkedIn

  • Blawg:

    • Inventorship: Another Look
    • The Rounded Lady Has Not Yet Sung
    • EU To Finally Get A Patent?
  • Trending

    35 U.S.C. § 287 AIA android annuity apple application Bilski business method contract court design enforcement EPO Europe European Patent Office facebook fail blog federal circuit federal court fees France google grammar happy hour In re Bilski Italy litigation lunch 2.0 maintenace fee means-plus-function miappropriation Microsoft v. TomTom mobile ornamental patent patent filing patent wars podcast prior art provisional samsung secret software Software patents uspto
  • Home
  • Philosophy
  • Attorneys
    • Adam L.K. Philipp
    • Kyle Flindt
    • Chad Kirby
    • Martin Garthwaite
  • Practice
    • Patents
    • Copyrights
    • Trademarks
    • Trade Secrets
    • IP Transactions
  • Blog
  • News
    • Firm News
    • Publications
  • Contact Us
    • Directions
    • Online Payment
    • Referrals
    • Careers

© 2010 ÆON Law, 1218 3rd Ave., Suite 2100, Seattle, WA 98101 info@aeonlaw.com. All rights reserved.

Site Map | Disclaimer