CALL US: 206.533.3854
CALL US  206.533.3854
AEON Law logo full color transparent

Try Again: USPTO Guidelines Need Further Explanation

USPTO
Makes a second attempt to
Clarify guidelines

As we previously reported, in March the US Patent and Trademark Office issued new guidelines and training materials for patent examiners to help them determine whether patent claims based on products of nature, natural laws, and natural phenomena may be allowed.

However, a lot of patent attorneys apparently didn’t understand the original examples, so the USPTO is trying again.

“We understand there are some issues where the public maybe misunderstands or didn’t quite get the concepts we were approaching,” said June Cohan of the Office of Patent Legal Administration.

The Patent Office is developing a second round of more in-depth training materials and seeking the public’s input on any aspect of the initial “Laws of Nature/Natural Products Guidance” documents.

The Patent Office is hosting a public forum on May 9 to seek feedback on the documents.

Interested parties may attend in person or via webcast. Beginning at 1:00 p.m. EDT and ending at 4:00 p.m. EDT, the webcast will be available on the Office’s Internet Web site at http://www.uspto.gov/patents/announce/myriad-mayo.jsp.

According to the USPTO’s announcement:

The forum will provide an opportunity for participants to present their interpretation of the impact of Supreme Court precedent on the complex legal and technical issues involved in subject matter eligibility analyses during patent examination. Participants who believe that the Supreme Court decisions could be implemented in an alternative manner from the approach taken in the Laws of Nature/Natural Products Guidance should use the forum to present their alternative approach and the legal rationale for the alternative. The forum also can be used by participants to suggest additional examples for use by the Office to create a more complete picture of the impact of Supreme Court precedent on subject matter eligibility.

Members of the public may also submit written comments on the new guidelines, whether they are attending the forum or not.

The comments may be sent by email to myriad-mayo_2014@uspto.gov. Registration requests for the forum may also be sent to that email address.

The comments will be available via the USPTO’s Web site at http://www.uspto.gov/patents/announce/myriad-mayo.jsp. Thus, confidential or private information should not be included in a comment.

Related Articles

Federal Circuit Finds No Motive to Combine in Laser Projector Patent Case

The Federal Circuit has reversed a finding by the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB or Board) that certain challenged claims of a patent for ...
Read More

Federal Circuit Affirms Blockchain Gem Patent Is Invalid

The Federal Circuit has affirmed a lower court’s decision finding the claims of a patent for preventing gemstone counterfeiting invalid. The case is Rady v. ...
Read More

Tennessee Passes Law Against AI Voice Copies

The state of Tennessee has passed a law against the use of artificial intelligence (AI) to copy a person’s voice. The law, signed on March ...
Read More

Let's work together.

Contact us to set up a meeting with an attorney or team member.

Stay Informed

Sign up to receive Patent Poetry—a monthly roundup of key IP issues in our signature haiku format. Four articles (only 68 syllables); zero hassle.

SECTORS

HIGH
TECHNOLOGY

Artificial Intelligence

Blockchain & Cryptocurrency

Computer Technology & Software

Consumer Electronics

Electrical Devices

MECHANICAL
& PRODUCTS​

Cleantech

Mechanical Devices

Consumer & Retail Products

Hardware & Tools

Toys & Games

LIFE SCIENCES
& CHEMISTRY​

Biotechnology

Chemical Compounds

Digital Health

Healthcare Products

Pharmaceuticals

BRANDING
& CREATIVE​

Books & Publications

Brand Creation

Luxury Products

Photography & Video

Product Design

SERVICES

PROTECT

DEAL

DEFEND