206-217-2200


This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International3.0 Unported2.5 Generic2.0 Generic and 1.0 Generic license.
Attribution: Rico Shen

Alibaba leads
in seeking blockchain patents,
avoids cryptocash

Alibaba, the Chinese company, submitted 43 blockchain-related patent applications in 2017, making it second in China only to the People’s Bank of China, with 68.

Overall, as we discussed in this blog, 406 blockchain-related patent applications were filed in 2017. More than half of the applications came from China, and the US was number two.

Alibaba Group Holding Limited is a multinational e-commerce, retail, internet, and technology company founded in 1999. It had a market cap of $542 billion as of June, 2018.

According to Smartereum, Alibaba is using blockchain technology to “fight food fraud, secure medical data and track cross-border shipments.”

Alibaba, via its Lynx International shipping and logistics subsidiary, uses blockchain technology to track information about production, transportation, customs, and inspection of goods.

The company appears to have no interest in the most common application of blockchain technology — cryptocurrencies like bitcoin.

Alibaba’s founder, Jack Ma, said he was “totally confused” by cryptocurrencies and knew little about them.

China currently prohibits cryptocurrency activities.

Alibaba announced in January that “Alibaba Cloud has never issued a Bitcoin-like virtual currency, and it will not host any [cryptocurrency] mining platforms.”

An unrelated company, ABBC Foundation, announced an initial coin offering (ICO) for a virtual currency to be called “Alibabacoin.” ABBC raised more than $3.5 million in the ICO.

Alibaba’s legal team responded by suing for trademark infringement.

However, in May a US court denied Alibaba’s request for an injunction against Dubai-based ABBC, on jurisdictional grounds.

ABBC claims that its coin’s name is based on the character of “Ali Baba” from the Middle Eastern folk tale “One Thousand and One Nights,” rather than on the Chinese company’s name.

The case is Alibaba Group Holdings Ltd v. Alibabacoin Foundation.

Do you have a question for our team about this?

Copy link