CALL US: 206.533.3854
CALL US  206.533.3854
AEON law logo on grey background

2001 (The Movie) as iPad Prior Art?

Samsung claims Kubrick
Invented the iPad first;
Is it prior art?

As noted previously, Apple is engaged in litigation on many fronts against Samsung, over alleged infringement of iPad-related intellectual property rights by Samsung’s Galaxy Tab and other Android products.

Samsung has filed an opposition brief against Apple’s motion for a preliminary injunction to remove from the US market the Samsung Infuse 4G, Galaxy S 4G, Droid Charge, and Galaxy Tax 10.1, arguing that at least one of Apple’s iPad patents is invalid due to the existence of prior art.

The prior art in question appears in Stanley Kubrick’s 1968 movie “2001: A Space Odyssey.” According to Samsung’s court filings:

In a clip from that film lasting about one minute, two astronauts are eating and at the same time using personal tablet computers. The clip can be downloaded online here. As with the design claimed by the D’889 Patent, the tablet disclosed in the clip has an overall rectangular shape with a dominant display screen, narrow borders, a predominately flat front surface, a flat back surface (which is evident because the tablets are lying flat on the table’s surface), and a thin form factor.

In order for a movie or a novel to qualify as “prior art” it must be “enabling.” This means that the average person skilled in the relevant art (industrial design, for example), must be able to actually construct the invention based on the fictional description. Thus, the holodeck on “Star Trek” would probably not be considered prior art, because the series doesn’t detail how it works. However, Samsung does have a good argument that the ornamental design of a tablet computer might be enabled by a fictional representation of one.

In 1934, science fiction novelist Robert Heinlein conceived the idea of the water bed when he was hospitalized, and went on to describe it in three of his books. This was enough to prevent the issuance of a US patent on water beds when they became popular in the 60’s.

The hearing on Apple’s injunction motion is scheduled for October 13.

Related Articles

Buying Rival’s Trademark as Keyword Search Doesn’t Violate Lanham Act

The Ninth Circuit has affirmed a district court’s grant of summary judgment for the defendant in a case in which the plaintiff law firm claimed ...
Read More

What does copyright law have to do with McDonalds ice cream machines?

The US Copyright Office has granted a copyright exemption giving restaurants the right to repair broken equipment by bypassing locks intended to prevent anyone other ...
Read More

What’s Happening with AI and Copyright Law

Not surprisingly, a lot is happening at the intersection of artificial intelligence (AI) and intellectual property (IP) law. Here’s a roundup of some recent developments ...
Read More

Let's work together.

Contact us to set up a meeting with an attorney or team member.

Stay Informed

Sign up to receive Patent Poetry—a monthly roundup of key IP issues in our signature haiku format. Four articles (only 68 syllables); zero hassle.

SECTORS

HIGH
TECHNOLOGY

Artificial Intelligence

Blockchain & Cryptocurrency

Computer Technology & Software

Consumer Electronics

Electrical Devices

MECHANICAL
& PRODUCTS​

Cleantech

Mechanical Devices

Consumer & Retail Products

Hardware & Tools

Toys & Games

LIFE SCIENCES
& CHEMISTRY​

Biotechnology

Chemical Compounds

Digital Health

Healthcare Products

Pharmaceuticals

BRANDING
& CREATIVE​

Books & Publications

Brand Creation

Luxury Products

Photography & Video

Product Design

call us  206.533.3854