CALL US: 206.533.3854
CALL US  206.533.3854
AEON Law logo full color transparent
Another patent issued - by epredator is licensed under CC BY 2.0

China to Cancel Intellectual Property Application Subsidies

China to cancel
IP filing subsidies,
Post US report

As we discussed in this recent blog, China has been dominating patent filings in the blockchain field since Chinese President Xi Jinping called for his country to accelerate the adoption of blockchain technologies in 2019.

As we mentioned, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) recently issued a report on how the Chinese government has financially encouraged the filing of trademark and patent applications both in China and abroad.

One way that the Chinese government has encouraged such filings is by providing subsidies that more than cover the cost of the applications. This makes filing patent and trademark applications a profit center for businesses.

Perhaps not surprisingly, this has been seen as hurting the quality of patents and trademarks filed by Chinese entities, while at the same time hugely boosting the number of Chinese patent and trademark applications.

As the United States Patent and Trademark Office report notes, from 2013 to 2017

U.S. trademark filings from China increased by 1,264 percent, with applications from Shenzhen accounting for more than 42 percent of applications from China in the fiscal year 2017.

In 2020, the Chinese government ordered state-owned businesses to increase foreign trademark filings by 50% and to double their foreign patents by 2025.

Mary Boney Denison, the US Commissioner for Trademarks, testified to Congress that “this dramatic rise in applications coincides with the rise in inaccurate and fraudulent claims of use that threaten to undermine the reliability of the trademark register.”

The majority of Chinese trademark applications in the US in recent years have included fraudulent specimens of the marks allegedly being used on products in commerce.

Coincidentally or not, on January 27 – two weeks after the critical USPTO report was released – China announced that it is phasing out or limiting patent application subsidies.

As the National Review reports,

Subsidies for patent application filings and other stages of the patent prosecution process (e.g., requesting exam) will end by June 30, 2021. Only subsidies for granting of patents (including foreign patents) are allowed for now but local governments must cancel them by 2025.

Additionally, Chinese funding of the official fees for obtaining patent rights will not be allowed to exceed 50% of the fees – eliminating patent filings as a profit center.

As the National Review noted,

Subsidies are likely a major factor in the growth of Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) applications, in which China was the top filer in 2019. For example, the city of Shanghai provides a patent subsidy of 50,000 RMB (~$7,700 USD) for each foreign patent granted via the PCT versus 40,000 RMB for each foreign patent grant that was filed directly (e.g., via Paris Convention).  However, the subsidy for the grant of Chinese patents is only 2,500 RMB. 

China will continue to offer other forms of incentives for patent filings. Perhaps the most unusual is the use of patents as a sort of “get out of jail free” card.

As the South China Morning Post reported,

Prisoners in China are buying inventors’ ideas so they can patent them and reduce their jail sentences, according to a newspaper report.

The inmates are taking advantage of a law that allows jail terms to be commuted if prisoners can prove they have come up with important technical innovations and inventions, the Beijing Youth Daily said.

The newspaper said it had found a number of agents openly advertising the service to “reduce sentences by patented innovations.”

The reduction in government support for patent applications is expected to reduce the number of low-value Chinese applications cluttering up the application pipelines in China, the US, and elsewhere.


Just like the haiku above, we like to keep our posts short and sweet. Hopefully, you found this bite-sized information helpful. If you would like more information, please do not hesitate to contact us here.

Related Articles

Federal Circuit Finds No Motive to Combine in Laser Projector Patent Case

The Federal Circuit has reversed a finding by the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB or Board) that certain challenged claims of a patent for ...
Read More

Federal Circuit Affirms Blockchain Gem Patent Is Invalid

The Federal Circuit has affirmed a lower court’s decision finding the claims of a patent for preventing gemstone counterfeiting invalid. The case is Rady v. ...
Read More

Tennessee Passes Law Against AI Voice Copies

The state of Tennessee has passed a law against the use of artificial intelligence (AI) to copy a person’s voice. The law, signed on March ...
Read More

Let's work together.

Contact us to set up a meeting with an attorney or team member.

Stay Informed

Sign up to receive Patent Poetry—a monthly roundup of key IP issues in our signature haiku format. Four articles (only 68 syllables); zero hassle.

SECTORS

HIGH
TECHNOLOGY

Artificial Intelligence

Blockchain & Cryptocurrency

Computer Technology & Software

Consumer Electronics

Electrical Devices

MECHANICAL
& PRODUCTS​

Cleantech

Mechanical Devices

Consumer & Retail Products

Hardware & Tools

Toys & Games

LIFE SCIENCES
& CHEMISTRY​

Biotechnology

Chemical Compounds

Digital Health

Healthcare Products

Pharmaceuticals

BRANDING
& CREATIVE​

Books & Publications

Brand Creation

Luxury Products

Photography & Video

Product Design

SERVICES

PROTECT

DEAL

DEFEND