CALL US: 206.533.3854
CALL US  206.533.3854
AEON Law logo full color transparent
By Mattstone911 - Own work, CC BY-SA 3.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=28206992

Court Refuses to Dismiss Copyright Case on “Fair Use” Grounds

Appropriation —
when can you say that it’s art —
and when infringement?

Richard Prince calls himself an “appropriation artist.”

Others call him a serial copyright infringer.

As the New York Times reports, a federal court judge in New York refused to dismiss a case against Prince brought by a photographer.

The photographer, David Graham, took a photo that he called “Rastafarian Smoking a Joint.”

Someone else posted a copy of the photo on an Instagram account.

Prince’s “art” consists of printing other people’s Instagram photos (including the Graham image) on large canvases, adding his own comments.

In 2014, Prince presented a gallery show of these works. Graham filed a cease-and-desist order against Prince and then sued him for copyright infringement.

Prince and the gallery where the work was shown asked to court to dismiss the case, arguing that Prince’s work was “transformative” and thus allowed under the “fair use” exception to copyright law.

Prince contended that his use of the phot was “transformative” because

a “reasonable viewer” would recognize that Prince uses Graham’s photograph simply as “raw material,” … to convey a number of potential messages, any one of which is new and distinct from Graham’s effort to “capture[ ] the spirit and gravitas of the Rastafarian people.” These possible new messages include: “a commentary on the power of social media to broadly disseminate others’ work,” an endorsement of social media’s ability to “generate[ ] discussion of art,” or a “condemnation of the vanity of social media.”

Graham contended that Prince’s putting his photo in a social media frame and adding “a single line of what Prince himself calls “gobblygook” (“Canal Zinian da lam jam [emoji of a raised fist]”) cannot be transformative.”

The judge declined to dismiss the case, writing:

The primary image in both works is the photograph itself. Prince has not materially altered the composition, presentation, scale, color palette and media originally used by Graham.

Also, noted the court,

A court cannot engage in the fair use inquiry until it has been presented with facts relevant to evaluating the fair use factors…. Due to the fact-sensitive nature of the inquiry, courts generally do not address the fair use defense until the summary judgment phase.

The decision is here.

Four other lawsuits have been filed by photographers whose work was used by Prince without their permission.

In a 2013 decision, the Second Circuit found that Prince’s work was in fact transformative and thus “fair use.”

Prince reportedly returned $36,000 that he had received for a blown-up Instagram post showing Ivanka Trump getting her hair done, saying that his own work was “fake” and that he “denounced” it.

Related Articles

Supreme Court: No Time Limit on Monetary Recovery in Copyright Cases

The US Supreme Court has ruled in favor of Sherman Nealy, a record producer who sued Warner Music for copyright infringement over a 2008 song by ...
Read More

Patent Office Requests Public Comment on AI Prior Art

The US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) has published a request for comment (RFC) on “how AI could affect evaluations of how the level of ordinary skills ...
Read More

FTC Bans Employee Non-Compete Agreements

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has voted to approve a proposed rule that would ban employers from using non-compete agreements with nearly all employees. The ...
Read More

Let's work together.

Contact us to set up a meeting with an attorney or team member.

Stay Informed

Sign up to receive Patent Poetry—a monthly roundup of key IP issues in our signature haiku format. Four articles (only 68 syllables); zero hassle.

SECTORS

HIGH
TECHNOLOGY

Artificial Intelligence

Blockchain & Cryptocurrency

Computer Technology & Software

Consumer Electronics

Electrical Devices

MECHANICAL
& PRODUCTS​

Cleantech

Mechanical Devices

Consumer & Retail Products

Hardware & Tools

Toys & Games

LIFE SCIENCES
& CHEMISTRY​

Biotechnology

Chemical Compounds

Digital Health

Healthcare Products

Pharmaceuticals

BRANDING
& CREATIVE​

Books & Publications

Brand Creation

Luxury Products

Photography & Video

Product Design

SERVICES

PROTECT

DEAL

DEFEND