CALL US: 206.533.3854
CALL US  206.533.3854
AEON Law logo full color transparent

Court Rules Seuss/Star Trek Parody Didn’t Violate Trademark Law

Star Trek parody
Didn’t violate Seuss rights
in original

A federal court in California has ruled that the title of a book called Oh, the Places You’ll Boldly Go! didn’t violate the trademark of Dr. Seuss Enterprises.

Theodor Seuss Geisel, who wrote under the name “Dr. Seuss,” was the author of more than 60 children’s books, including Oh, the Places You’ll Go!

The authors of the Boldly version launched a Kickstarter campaign to finance the printing and distribution of their book, which combines Seuss-style language with Star Trek characters and other elements.

The court found that Boldly was a parody and thus allowed as fair use.

In the 1989 Rogers v. Grimaldi case, which involved a suit by actress/dancer Ginger Rogers over the Federico Fellini film Ginger and Fred, the Ninth Circuit ruled that the title of an expressive work (such as a book) may be used with another work under the Lanham Act (which governs trademarks)

unless the title has no artistic relevance to the underlying work whatsoever, or, if it has some artistic relevance, unless the title explicitly misleads as to the source or the content of the work.

According to the court in the Seuss case, this test

insulates from restriction titles with at least minimal artistic relevance that are ambiguous or only implicitly misleading but leaves vulnerable to claims of deception titles that are explicitly misleading as to source or content, or that have no artistic relevance at all.

The Boldly book was clearly labeled as a parody, stating:

This is a work of parody, and is not associated with or endorsed by CBS Studios or Dr. Seuss Enterprises, L.P. … Copyright Disclaimer under section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for `fair use’ for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education, research, and parody.

However, the court only ruled on trademark infringement claims involving the title, and not on infringement claims involving the font and illustration style in the Boldly book.

The case is Dr. Seuss Enterprises v. ComicMix LLC.

Related Articles

Just Because It’s on the Internet Doesn’t Mean It’s “Publicly Accessible”

The Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB or Board) has denied institution of a petition for inter partes review (IPR) because the petitioner failed to ...
Read More

Trademark Denied for “ChatGPT”

The US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) has denied OpenAI’s applications to trademark “ChatGPT” and “GPT.” The Final Office Action states, “Registration is refused because the applied-for mark ...
Read More

Federal Circuit: “Improving User Experience” Isn’t Patentable

The Federal Circuit has affirmed a lower court decision that patent claims for methods and systems for improving how search results are displayed to users ...
Read More

Stay Informed

Sign up to receive Patent Poetry—a monthly roundup of key IP issues in our signature haiku format. Four articles (only 68 syllables); zero hassle.



Artificial Intelligence

Blockchain & Cryptocurrency

Computer Technology & Software

Consumer Electronics

Electrical Devices



Mechanical Devices

Consumer & Retail Products

Hardware & Tools

Toys & Games



Chemical Compounds

Digital Health

Healthcare Products



Books & Publications

Brand Creation

Luxury Products

Photography & Video

Product Design