CALL US: 206.533.3854
CALL US  206.533.3854

Daimler Claims Amazon Doesn’t Do Enough to Prevent Sales of Counterfeit Parts

Amazon is sued;
company claims infringement
of its wheel trademarks

Daimler, the German automaker, has sued Amazon in the Central District of California, claiming that Amazon is complicit in the sale of counterfeit Mercedes-Benz parts online.

The causes of action are for direct trademark infringement, direct counterfeiting, unfair competition, and related claims.

Daimler says that the case arises out of

Amazon’s unauthorized use of Daimler’s trademarks in connection with the advertising, marketing, promoting, distributing, displaying, offering for sale, and/or selling of unlicensed, infringing, and/or counterfeit versions of Daimler’s Mercedes-Benz wheel center caps.

Daimler says the sales aren’t merely third-party sales facilitated by Amazon via the Amazon Marketplace.

Rather, alleges Daimler, “the sales at issue are infringing products that are ‘shipped from and sold by Amazon.com.’”

According to Daimler,

The Counterfeit Report, a consumer advocacy organization, reports that it sent over 32,000 notices of infringing items to Amazon, and many of these items remain listed despite repeated complaints.

Sales of these counterfeits, according to Daimler, displace sales of authentic goods. The shoddy fake goods also damage brands’ reputations.

The suit claims that, despite efforts by Daimler and other brand owners to get Amazon to respect their intellectual property rights and the reputation of their brands, Amazon refused to take reasonable steps to police intellectual property infringement on its site and source products only from authorized manufacturers, wholesalers, and retailers.

Daimler is seeking injunctive relief and the recovery of damages, plus triple damages as a penalty for willful infringement.

Last year, Daimler brought a similar case against Amazon for the sale of replica wheels.

To receive poetic updates on IP law, sign up for our monthly collection of patent haikus and news here:

Related Articles

Federal Circuit: Letter Triggers On-Sale Bar in Patent Case

The Federal Circuit reversed and remanded a district court’s finding that patents were not invalid under the on-sale bar, finding that a letter sent to ...
Read More

Vibes, Trade Dress, and AI

As the New York Times recently reported, one online influencer is suing another, claiming she stole her “vibes.” As the Times explains, The oversize beige ...
Read More

Jury Awards Netlist $118 Million in Second Samsung Patent Infringement Case

A federal jury in Texas has awarded Netlist $118 million in damages for patent infringement by Samsung. Netlist, founded in 2000, is a Delaware company ...
Read More

Let's work together.

Contact us to set up a meeting with an attorney or team member.

Stay Informed

Sign up to receive Patent Poetry—a monthly roundup of key IP issues in our signature haiku format. Four articles (only 68 syllables); zero hassle.

SECTORS

HIGH
TECHNOLOGY

Artificial Intelligence

Blockchain & Cryptocurrency

Computer Technology & Software

Consumer Electronics

Electrical Devices

MECHANICAL
& PRODUCTS​

Cleantech

Mechanical Devices

Consumer & Retail Products

Hardware & Tools

Toys & Games

LIFE SCIENCES
& CHEMISTRY​

Biotechnology

Chemical Compounds

Digital Health

Healthcare Products

Pharmaceuticals

BRANDING
& CREATIVE​

Books & Publications

Brand Creation

Luxury Products

Photography & Video

Product Design

call us  206.533.3854