CALL US: 206.533.3854
CALL US  206.533.3854
AEON law logo on grey background

Does Apple Own Kodak’s Patents?

Apple wants Kodak
Blocked from borrowing against
Disputed patents

Apple has asked a US bankruptcy court to prevent Eastman Kodak from obtaining loans using patents that allegedly belong to Apple as collateral.

Kodak, founded in 1880, filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in January, 2012.  The company’s known for iconic film brands like Kodachrome, which it stopped producing in 2009.  Kodachrome was favored by many professional photographers during its 74-year history and was immortalized in song by Paul Simon.

Citigroup is providing Kodak with almost a billion dollars in financing to allow it to keep operating normally during the bankruptcy.  The loan is secured by all of Kodak’s assets, including its intellectual property.  Kodak is also raising cash by licensing over 1,000 patents related to digital imaging.

The company has struggled in recent years to adapt to the advent of digital photography.  Apple’s bankruptcy court claims involve what is believed to be the first digital camera:  the QuickTake 100, which Apple sold for $749 in 1994.  Time magazine ranked it among its “100 greatest and most influential gadgets from 1923 to the present.”

Apple partnered with Kodak to create the camera, which was manufactured by Chinon in Japan.  Apple built a series of digital cameras in conjunction with Fuji until 1997, when Steve Jobs returned to the company and discontinued the product line.

Apple claims that “through this collaboration, Apple disclosed the architecture for its confidential digital camera technology to Kodak subject to various non-disclosure agreements, which also provided that any improvements Kodak made to Apple’s disclosures remain the property of Apple.”

Apple says that it discovered in early 2010 that Kodak had misappropriated this Apple technology and patented it.  Apple sued Kodak over one of these patents in August 2010.

Apple says that it believes Kodak has earned $3 billion in licensing revenues from the disputed patent, and has sought “all or a substantial portion of” these revenues.

Related Articles

Buying Rival’s Trademark as Keyword Search Doesn’t Violate Lanham Act

The Ninth Circuit has affirmed a district court’s grant of summary judgment for the defendant in a case in which the plaintiff law firm claimed ...
Read More

What does copyright law have to do with McDonalds ice cream machines?

The US Copyright Office has granted a copyright exemption giving restaurants the right to repair broken equipment by bypassing locks intended to prevent anyone other ...
Read More

What’s Happening with AI and Copyright Law

Not surprisingly, a lot is happening at the intersection of artificial intelligence (AI) and intellectual property (IP) law. Here’s a roundup of some recent developments ...
Read More

Let's work together.

Contact us to set up a meeting with an attorney or team member.

Stay Informed

Sign up to receive Patent Poetry—a monthly roundup of key IP issues in our signature haiku format. Four articles (only 68 syllables); zero hassle.

SECTORS

HIGH
TECHNOLOGY

Artificial Intelligence

Blockchain & Cryptocurrency

Computer Technology & Software

Consumer Electronics

Electrical Devices

MECHANICAL
& PRODUCTS​

Cleantech

Mechanical Devices

Consumer & Retail Products

Hardware & Tools

Toys & Games

LIFE SCIENCES
& CHEMISTRY​

Biotechnology

Chemical Compounds

Digital Health

Healthcare Products

Pharmaceuticals

BRANDING
& CREATIVE​

Books & Publications

Brand Creation

Luxury Products

Photography & Video

Product Design

call us  206.533.3854