CALL US: 206.533.3854
CALL US  206.533.3854
AEON law logo on grey background

Facebook Strikes Back

In counter-attack,
Facebook strikes back at Yahoo
And buys more patents

As previously reported in this blog, Yahoo sued Facebook last month for patent infringement.

Now Facebook has sued Yahoo in return, claiming that Yahoo has violated Facebook patents that cover 80% of Yahoo’s 2011 revenue, amounting to more than $4 billion.  The businesses involved include display advertising, content personalization, and photo sharing, according to Facebook.

At the time Yahoo originally sued Facebook, some commentators suggested that it might be able to force a speedy settlement, to prevent the suit from interfering with Facebook’s imminent $5 billion IPO.  The new suit by Facebook suggests that Facebook is willing to fight.  Alternatively, Facebook might attempt to settle by giving Yahoo shares of Facebook – a tactic Google used to settle a patent dispute in 2004.

Facebook, which reportedly owned only 56 patents and 503 US patent applications at the time Yahoo filed suit, subsequently acquired 750 patents from IBM.  According to its IPO filing, Facebook also had 33 corresponding patents and 149 filed applications in foreign countries.  Acquired patents accounted for $51 million of Facebook’s goodwill and intangible assets in 2011, up from $33 million in 2010.

Facebook employees only invented two of the technologies covered by the patents cited in its suit against Yahoo.  The rest were purchased, and some were granted before Facebook was founded in 2004.

Some have questioned whether Yahoo might be shooting itself in the foot by suing Facebook, which is one of its most important partners.  Yahoo, which has suffered declining sales for the past three years, boosted traffic from Facebook 300% from September to December of last year by integrating Facebook’s news activity feature into its own sites.

Yahoo’s new CEO, Scott Thompson, recently laid off 2,000 Yahoo employees – 14% of the company’s workforce.  It was the largest layoff in the company’s 17-year history.

Related Articles

Buying Rival’s Trademark as Keyword Search Doesn’t Violate Lanham Act

The Ninth Circuit has affirmed a district court’s grant of summary judgment for the defendant in a case in which the plaintiff law firm claimed ...
Read More

What does copyright law have to do with McDonalds ice cream machines?

The US Copyright Office has granted a copyright exemption giving restaurants the right to repair broken equipment by bypassing locks intended to prevent anyone other ...
Read More

What’s Happening with AI and Copyright Law

Not surprisingly, a lot is happening at the intersection of artificial intelligence (AI) and intellectual property (IP) law. Here’s a roundup of some recent developments ...
Read More

Let's work together.

Contact us to set up a meeting with an attorney or team member.

Stay Informed

Sign up to receive Patent Poetry—a monthly roundup of key IP issues in our signature haiku format. Four articles (only 68 syllables); zero hassle.

SECTORS

HIGH
TECHNOLOGY

Artificial Intelligence

Blockchain & Cryptocurrency

Computer Technology & Software

Consumer Electronics

Electrical Devices

MECHANICAL
& PRODUCTS​

Cleantech

Mechanical Devices

Consumer & Retail Products

Hardware & Tools

Toys & Games

LIFE SCIENCES
& CHEMISTRY​

Biotechnology

Chemical Compounds

Digital Health

Healthcare Products

Pharmaceuticals

BRANDING
& CREATIVE​

Books & Publications

Brand Creation

Luxury Products

Photography & Video

Product Design

call us  206.533.3854