CALL US: 206.533.3854
CALL US  206.533.3854
AEON Law logo full color transparent
By Travelarz - Own work, CC BY-SA 3.0 pl,

Federal Circuit Says Domain Names Can Be Trademarked

Federal Circuit
allows trademarks for domains —
if they’re distinctive

The Federal Circuit has ruled that a domain name including a “generic” term can be eligible for trademark protection.

The case arose when, the reservation service, sought to trademark its name for travel agency services and hotel reservation services.

One of the applications was for the simple word mark “”

The US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) denied the company’s four applications, finding that the proposed mark was generic or was merely descriptive of the company’s services.

The company appealed, and the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) affirmed the refusals. The company then filed suit against the director of the USPTO and the case made its way to the Federal Circuit

Among other evidence, the company submitted what’s known as a “Teflon survey.”  This is the most widely-used survey format for measuring consumer opinion when a company claims that its name isn’t generic.

The federal Lanham Act, which governs trademarks, identifies four categories of marks. As the court noted,

Arrayed in an ascending order which roughly reflects their eligibility [for] trademark status and the degree of protection accorded, these classes are (1) generic, (2) descriptive, (3) suggestive, and (4) arbitrary or fanciful.

A generic mark refers to the genus or class of which a product or service is a member and can never be protected.

A descriptive mark “describes a function, use, characteristic, size, or intended purpose” of the product or service, such as 5 Minute glue and the Yellow Pages telephone directory.

Descriptive marks are protected only if they’ve acquired secondary meaning, “that is, if in the minds of the public, the primary significance of a product [or service] feature or term is to identify the source of the product [or service] rather than the product [or service] itself.”

Suggestive marks include Coppertone for sunscreen and Orange Crush for orange-flavored soda.

Examples of arbitrary marks include “Apple” for computers.

Fanciful marks are made-up words such as “Clorox” for bleach and “Kodak” for cameras.

The court reviewed several cases involving proposed “dot com” trademarks that were rejected by the courts.  However, the court allowed the trademark registration in this case, because:

when combined with an SLD, a TLD generally has source identifying significance and the combination of a generic SLD and a TLD is generally a descriptive mark that is protectable upon a showing of acquired distinctiveness.

A “TLD” is a top-level domain such as .com or .net, and a “SLD” is a second-level domain — the word or phrase to the left of the dot — for example, the “Aeonlaw” in “”

This doesn’t mean that ALL domain names may be trademarked. The applicant may still need to establish distinctiveness.

In this case, was able to show, among other things, that it had 100,000 Twitter followers and more than five million Facebook “likes” and that the Teflon survey showed that 74.8 of respondents identified as a brand name.

The case is v. Matal.

Related Articles

Supreme Court: No Time Limit on Monetary Recovery in Copyright Cases

The US Supreme Court has ruled in favor of Sherman Nealy, a record producer who sued Warner Music for copyright infringement over a 2008 song by ...
Read More

Patent Office Requests Public Comment on AI Prior Art

The US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) has published a request for comment (RFC) on “how AI could affect evaluations of how the level of ordinary skills ...
Read More

FTC Bans Employee Non-Compete Agreements

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has voted to approve a proposed rule that would ban employers from using non-compete agreements with nearly all employees. The ...
Read More

Let's work together.

Contact us to set up a meeting with an attorney or team member.

Stay Informed

Sign up to receive Patent Poetry—a monthly roundup of key IP issues in our signature haiku format. Four articles (only 68 syllables); zero hassle.



Artificial Intelligence

Blockchain & Cryptocurrency

Computer Technology & Software

Consumer Electronics

Electrical Devices



Mechanical Devices

Consumer & Retail Products

Hardware & Tools

Toys & Games



Chemical Compounds

Digital Health

Healthcare Products



Books & Publications

Brand Creation

Luxury Products

Photography & Video

Product Design