CALL US: 206.533.3854
CALL US  206.533.3854
AEON Law logo full color transparent
By Dwight Sipler from Stow, MA, USA - LettuceUploaded by Jacopo Werther, CC BY 2.0,
By Dwight Sipler from Stow, MA, USA - LettuceUploaded by Jacopo Werther, CC BY 2.0,

Formula Patent Doesn’t Destroy Trade Secret Status

Formula patent
Doesn’t destroy trade secret
Rules Court of Appeal

The California Court of Appeal has held that disclosing a formula in a patent doesn’t destroy the formula’s trade secret status as long as the patent doesn’t disclose the process for how the trade secret is applied.

Global Protein Products is a coating company that claims as a trade secret formula and process for treating iceberg lettuce to prolong its shelf life.

Le, a scientist, was employed by Global and learned the formula for the product subject to a confidentiality agreement. Le left Global and started a competing company, trying to sell to Global’s customers.

Global sued Le for trade secret misappropriation, breach of contract, and unfair competition. The trial court granted a permanent injunction against Le’s activities using the secret.

Le appealed, claiming that because Global had acquired a pre-existing patent for the formula, the alleged “secret” was in the public domain.

The acquired patent was for “a process and formula for making a zein film in pure water.”

The court agreed that, in general, “publication of a trade secret destroys it.”

However, in this case the “trade secret was not limited to the identity of the components used; the trade secret encompassed the proprietary formula and the process for treating lettuce.” (Emphasis added.)

As the court noted, Global’s head scientist discovered that a particular organic acid, if used with the patented process and formula, could extend the shelf life of lettuce for seven days. Global never disclosed the identity of the organic acid, and didn’t patent the combination of the organic acid with the acquired patent. Instead, Global treated the organic acid, used in conjunction with the patent, as a trade secret.

One important thing to note about the case: the patent involved was issued in 1997 and has subsequently expired. Trade secrets, unlike patents, have no automatic expiration dates and can continue to protect proprietary information indefinitely.

Inventors often need to make strategic decisions about whether to protect their intellectual property using patents, trade secret law, or (as in this case) both.

The case is Global Protein Products, Inc. v. Le.

Related Articles

Just Because It’s on the Internet Doesn’t Mean It’s “Publicly Accessible”

The Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB or Board) has denied institution of a petition for inter partes review (IPR) because the petitioner failed to ...
Read More

Trademark Denied for “ChatGPT”

The US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) has denied OpenAI’s applications to trademark “ChatGPT” and “GPT.” The Final Office Action states, “Registration is refused because the applied-for mark ...
Read More

Federal Circuit: “Improving User Experience” Isn’t Patentable

The Federal Circuit has affirmed a lower court decision that patent claims for methods and systems for improving how search results are displayed to users ...
Read More

Stay Informed

Sign up to receive Patent Poetry—a monthly roundup of key IP issues in our signature haiku format. Four articles (only 68 syllables); zero hassle.



Artificial Intelligence

Blockchain & Cryptocurrency

Computer Technology & Software

Consumer Electronics

Electrical Devices



Mechanical Devices

Consumer & Retail Products

Hardware & Tools

Toys & Games



Chemical Compounds

Digital Health

Healthcare Products



Books & Publications

Brand Creation

Luxury Products

Photography & Video

Product Design