CALL US: 206.533.3854
CALL US  206.533.3854
AEON Law logo full color transparent
By Gh9449 - Own work, CC BY-SA 4.0,

How Much Are Your Phone Snapshots Worth?

Phone photographer
Prevails in copyright case
Over terror pic

Most smartphone photos don’t have anything but sentimental value, but if you happen to take a picture of the right thing at the right time, your picture could be worth quite a lot.

On October 21, 2017, Alex Cruz was walking in the Tribeca neighborhood in New York on the way to visit his girlfriend.

He noticed a “big commotion” and a man acting erratically as police approached him.

Cruz took out his iPhone and snapped a photo of Sayfullo Saipov lying on the ground and being arrested by police after committing a terrorist attack.

Cruz sent the photo to a friend who posted the photo to his own Instagram account and initially took credit for it. Cruz’s girlfriend pointed out it was actually Cruz’s photo.

Media organizations then contacted Cruz’s girlfriend seeking permission from Cruz to republish the photo. Cruz licensed it to CNN and NBC.

Cox, “a national media company with 13 television stations, 61 radio stations, four newspapers, and 72 websites” added Cruz’s photo to a gallery of video and photographic content about the terror attack. Cox failed to credit Cruz or obtain a license.

Cruz registered his copyright for the photo shortly after he took it and sued Cox for copyright infringement.

The court noted that ”To establish [copyright] infringement two elements must be proven: (1) ownership of a valid copyright, and (2) copying of constituent elements of the work that are original.”

In addition, “A certificate of copyright registration is prima facie evidence of ownership of a valid copyright…”

Cox argued that Cruz “did not make a single creative choice” in taking the photo and that it didn’t possess the “modicum of creativity” required to receive copyright protection.

But as the court noted, “a person may create a worthwhile photograph by being at the right place at the right time.”

The court thus granted Cruz’s motion for summary judgement.

Just like the haiku above, we like to keep our posts short and sweet. Hopefully, you found this bite-sized information helpful. If you would like more information, please do not hesitate to contact us here.

Related Articles

Federal Circuit Finds Semiconductor Claims Unpatentable

Federal Circuit:
Semiconductor patent
Claims are not valid
Read More

TTAB: No Bright-Line Rule against Trademarks for Characters

TTAB says:
Characters can be trademarks
If used properly
Read More

Judge Throws Out Most of Artists’ AI Copyright Infringement Claims

Federal judge boots
Most AI copyright claims
Re: Stability
Read More

Stay Informed

Sign up to receive Patent Poetry—a monthly roundup of key IP issues in our signature haiku format. Four articles (only 68 syllables); zero hassle.



Artificial Intelligence

Blockchain & Cryptocurrency

Computer Technology & Software

Consumer Electronics

Electrical Devices



Mechanical Devices

Consumer & Retail Products

Hardware & Tools

Toys & Games



Chemical Compounds

Digital Health

Healthcare Products



Books & Publications

Brand Creation

Luxury Products

Photography & Video

Product Design