CALL US: 206.533.3854
CALL US  206.533.3854
AEON Law logo full color transparent
By Gh9449 - Own work, CC BY-SA 4.0,

How Much Are Your Phone Snapshots Worth?

Phone photographer
Prevails in copyright case
Over terror pic

Most smartphone photos don’t have anything but sentimental value, but if you happen to take a picture of the right thing at the right time, your picture could be worth quite a lot.

On October 21, 2017, Alex Cruz was walking in the Tribeca neighborhood in New York on the way to visit his girlfriend.

He noticed a “big commotion” and a man acting erratically as police approached him.

Cruz took out his iPhone and snapped a photo of Sayfullo Saipov lying on the ground and being arrested by police after committing a terrorist attack.

Cruz sent the photo to a friend who posted the photo to his own Instagram account and initially took credit for it. Cruz’s girlfriend pointed out it was actually Cruz’s photo.

Media organizations then contacted Cruz’s girlfriend seeking permission from Cruz to republish the photo. Cruz licensed it to CNN and NBC.

Cox, “a national media company with 13 television stations, 61 radio stations, four newspapers, and 72 websites” added Cruz’s photo to a gallery of video and photographic content about the terror attack. Cox failed to credit Cruz or obtain a license.

Cruz registered his copyright for the photo shortly after he took it and sued Cox for copyright infringement.

The court noted that ”To establish [copyright] infringement two elements must be proven: (1) ownership of a valid copyright, and (2) copying of constituent elements of the work that are original.”

In addition, “A certificate of copyright registration is prima facie evidence of ownership of a valid copyright…”

Cox argued that Cruz “did not make a single creative choice” in taking the photo and that it didn’t possess the “modicum of creativity” required to receive copyright protection.

But as the court noted, “a person may create a worthwhile photograph by being at the right place at the right time.”

The court thus granted Cruz’s motion for summary judgement.

Just like the haiku above, we like to keep our posts short and sweet. Hopefully, you found this bite-sized information helpful. If you would like more information, please do not hesitate to contact us here.

Related Articles

Supreme Court: No Time Limit on Monetary Recovery in Copyright Cases

The US Supreme Court has ruled in favor of Sherman Nealy, a record producer who sued Warner Music for copyright infringement over a 2008 song by ...
Read More

Patent Office Requests Public Comment on AI Prior Art

The US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) has published a request for comment (RFC) on “how AI could affect evaluations of how the level of ordinary skills ...
Read More

FTC Bans Employee Non-Compete Agreements

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has voted to approve a proposed rule that would ban employers from using non-compete agreements with nearly all employees. The ...
Read More

Let's work together.

Contact us to set up a meeting with an attorney or team member.

Stay Informed

Sign up to receive Patent Poetry—a monthly roundup of key IP issues in our signature haiku format. Four articles (only 68 syllables); zero hassle.



Artificial Intelligence

Blockchain & Cryptocurrency

Computer Technology & Software

Consumer Electronics

Electrical Devices



Mechanical Devices

Consumer & Retail Products

Hardware & Tools

Toys & Games



Chemical Compounds

Digital Health

Healthcare Products



Books & Publications

Brand Creation

Luxury Products

Photography & Video

Product Design