CALL US: 206.533.3854
CALL US  206.533.3854
AEON Law logo full color transparent
By Engraved by Benjamin Cole[1] (1695–1766) - Defoe, Daniel; Johnson, Charles (1724) "Capt. Teach alias Black-Beard" in A General History of the Pyrates: From Their First Rise and Settlement in the Island of Providence, to the Present Time. With the Remarkable Actions and Adventures of the Two Female Pyrates Mary Read and Anne Bonny. To Which is Added. A Short Abstract of the Statute and Civil Law, in Relation to Pyracy. (Second Edition ed.), London: T. Warner, pp. plate facing p. 70 Retrieved on 8 April 2010., Public Domain,

How to Identify and Stop Online Intellectual Property Infringers

Fighting online theft;
IP owners can use tools
To take down pirates

While the Internet makes it so much easier for owners of intellectual property (IP) to market their goods, it also makes it that much easier for pirates to infringe IP rights.

As the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) notes,

With estimated sales of US$133 billion in 2009, the fastest growing area of counterfeit trade is online.

Online infringement takes several forms, including:

  • Sale or sharing of unauthorized copies or downloads of digital media (such as movies, music, books, and videogames)
  • Sale of counterfeit physical products on platforms such as eBay

Companies like MarkMonitor provide technological solutions for searching for infringing material online.

Once it’s found, the simplest way to remove online content that infringes copyright is via the “notice-and-takedown” process of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA).

In order to take advantage of the “safe harbor” provisions that protect website owners against liability for copyright infringement by their users, website owners must designate a DMCA agent – a person who can be contacted to remove infringing material.

In the notice, a copyright owner (or the owner’s representative) must provide certain information about the alleged infringement:

      1. The date of the notification;
      2. A physical or electronic signature of a person authorized to act on behalf of the owner of an exclusive right that is allegedly infringed;
      3. A description of the copyrighted work claimed to have been infringed, or, if multiple copyrighted works on the Site are covered by a single notification, a representative list of such works at the Site;
      4. A description of the material that is claimed to be infringing or to be the subject of infringing activity and information sufficient to enable us to locate such work;
      5. Information reasonably sufficient to permit the site owner to contact the copyright owner, such as an address, telephone number, and/or email address;
      6. A statement that the person complaining has a good faith belief that use of the material in the manner complained of is not authorized by the copyright owner, its agent, or the law; and
      7. A statement that the information in the notification is accurate, and under penalty of perjury, that the person complaining is authorized to act on behalf of the owner of an exclusive right that is allegedly infringed.

The person who posted the allegedly infringing material can file a counter-notice, but usually what happens is that the website owner removes the infringing material.

The DMCA also provides a mechanism for obtaining a subpoena from an internet service provider (ISP) for “information sufficient to identify the alleged infringer” from the ISP’s business records (17 USC § 512(f)). 

A court can issue such a subpoena even if the copyright owner doesn’t file an actual complaint. Once the copyright owner knows who the infringer is, the owner can decide whether, where, and how to file suit to prevent further infringement and/or seek damages.

Related Articles

TTAB: No Bright-Line Rule against Trademarks for Characters

TTAB says:
Characters can be trademarks
If used properly
Read More

Judge Throws Out Most of Artists’ AI Copyright Infringement Claims

Federal judge boots
Most AI copyright claims
Re: Stability
Read More

Court Awards $1.6 Million in Damages in “Bored Ape” Case

Federal court says
“appropriation art” is
Plain old infringement
Read More

Stay Informed

Sign up to receive Patent Poetry—a monthly roundup of key IP issues in our signature haiku format. Four articles (only 68 syllables); zero hassle.



Artificial Intelligence

Blockchain & Cryptocurrency

Computer Technology & Software

Consumer Electronics

Electrical Devices



Mechanical Devices

Consumer & Retail Products

Hardware & Tools

Toys & Games



Chemical Compounds

Digital Health

Healthcare Products



Books & Publications

Brand Creation

Luxury Products

Photography & Video

Product Design