CALL US: 206.533.3854
CALL US  206.533.3854
Classic Film/Flickr

How the Hydrox Cookie (and Its Trademark) Came Back to Life

Hydrox cookie fan
brings back his favorite treat
and claims the trademark

NPR’s Planet Money podcast recently reported on how the Hydrox cookie — and the Hydrox trademark — were resurrected after years of obscurity.

As the podcast noted,

A trademark is a funny kind of property. It’s different from a patent, it’s different from owning the rights to a song. A trademark can be a single word, a slogan, a logo. It isn’t owning the business, it’s owning the things that make the business distinct and recognizable, what sets it apart. Trademarks serves two purposes: To prevent confusion for consumers, and to discourage knock-offs. You can think of it as a relationship between a company and its customers. It’s a signal that tells people buying a product: We made this, and it’s legit.

When a company stops using a trademark, it’s considered abandoned. At that point, anyone else can reclaim it.

As NPR reported, Hydrox cookies look like Oreos but the brand is older — introduced in 1908.  (Oreos, by the way, are reportedly the best-selling cookies in the world.)

Hydrox cookies — which fans consider superior to Oreos — were discontinued in 1999.

Ellia Kassoff grew up with Hydrox cookies and was disappointed to see them disappear from stores.

The Hydrox trademark had been passed on to Kellogg’s, and when Kassoff wrote to Kellogg he was told that the company had no plans to reintroduce the cookies.

Kassoff forwarded that letter to the US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) as evidence that the mark had been abandoned.  When the USPTO agreed, Kassoff then reclaimed the Hydrox mark for himself.

His next task was to recreate the actual cookie.  He hired a South Carolina food scientist who also grew up with Hydrox cookies and knew what they were supposed to taste like.

The next-generation Hydrox cookies are now sold on Amazon and in 4,000 US stores.

Related Articles

Federal Circuit: Letter Triggers On-Sale Bar in Patent Case

The Federal Circuit reversed and remanded a district court’s finding that patents were not invalid under the on-sale bar, finding that a letter sent to ...
Read More

Vibes, Trade Dress, and AI

As the New York Times recently reported, one online influencer is suing another, claiming she stole her “vibes.” As the Times explains, The oversize beige ...
Read More

Jury Awards Netlist $118 Million in Second Samsung Patent Infringement Case

A federal jury in Texas has awarded Netlist $118 million in damages for patent infringement by Samsung. Netlist, founded in 2000, is a Delaware company ...
Read More

Let's work together.

Contact us to set up a meeting with an attorney or team member.

Stay Informed

Sign up to receive Patent Poetry—a monthly roundup of key IP issues in our signature haiku format. Four articles (only 68 syllables); zero hassle.

SECTORS

HIGH
TECHNOLOGY

Artificial Intelligence

Blockchain & Cryptocurrency

Computer Technology & Software

Consumer Electronics

Electrical Devices

MECHANICAL
& PRODUCTS​

Cleantech

Mechanical Devices

Consumer & Retail Products

Hardware & Tools

Toys & Games

LIFE SCIENCES
& CHEMISTRY​

Biotechnology

Chemical Compounds

Digital Health

Healthcare Products

Pharmaceuticals

BRANDING
& CREATIVE​

Books & Publications

Brand Creation

Luxury Products

Photography & Video

Product Design

call us  206.533.3854