CALL US: 206.533.3854
CALL US  206.533.3854
AEON Law logo full color transparent
By Gloria Cabada-Leman - Spiced basmati rice, CC BY 2.0,

India and Pakistan Dispute Right to Claim Basmati Rice in EU

South Asian countries
Claim rights to Basmati rice.
EU will decide

What happens when two nuclear-armed nations go to war – over rice?

For about ten years, India and Pakistan have each been attempting to claim exclusive rights to use the Geographical Indication (GI) for Basmati rice in the European market.

A GI, as the European Commission explains, is very much like a trademark. It’s “a distinctive sign used to identify a product whose quality, reputation or other such characteristics relate to its geographical origin.”

Under EU rules, certain wines, spirits, agricultural products, and foodstuffs may only be marketed using certain names if they were actually produced in specific regions associated with those names.

But GI rules don’t only apply in the EU. The World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) notes that

A geographical indication (GI) is a sign used on products that have a specific geographical origin and possess qualities or a reputation that are due to that origin. In order to function as a GI, a sign must identify a product as originating in a given place. In addition, the qualities, characteristics or reputation of the product should be essentially due to the place of origin. Since the qualities depend on the geographical place of production, there is a clear link between the product and its original place of production.

GIs are covered under the Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property and by the World Trade Organization’s (WTO’s) Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS).

Some examples of Geographical Indications include:

  • Roquefort cheeseaged in natural caves around the Roquefort-sur-Soulzon region” of France
  • Georgian wine – made in the country of Georgia rather than the US state
  • Pinggu Peaches – from the Pinggu district north of Beijing

A Protected Geographical Indication (PGI), shows that at least one stage of production, processing, or preparation of the item covered by the GI takes place in the designated region.

As WIPO notes,

A geographical indication right enables those who have the right to use the indication to prevent its use by a third party whose product does not conform to the applicable standards. For example, in the jurisdictions in which the Darjeeling geographical indication is protected, producers of Darjeeling tea can exclude use of the term “Darjeeling” for tea not grown in their tea gardens or not produced according to the standards set out in the code of practice for the geographical indication.

However, a protected geographical indication does not enable the holder to prevent someone from making a product using the same techniques as those set out in the standards for that indication. Protection for a geographical indication is usually obtained by acquiring a right over the sign that constitutes the indication.

In 2009, as the Wall Street Journal explained,

Tensions between India and Pakistan have thwarted their plans to jointly own the term “basmati” for the aromatic rice, much as producers in Champagne, France, have the exclusive right to name their product.

The South Asian neighbors are big producers of the iconic long-grained rice, which is in rising demand from middle-class Indians as well as buyers in the Middle East and among Indians, and their restaurants, world-wide. India and Pakistan had planned to file a joint application for what’s called a “geographic indication” tag to lay claim to the name “basmati.”

But the basmati bandwagon has been derailed in the wake of the November’s terrorist attack on Mumbai, which was launched by militants sailing from Karachi.

More recently, India filed for PGI status in the EU in 2018. The application was published in September of 2020 and the status of the “Basmati” indication is now in the consultation stage.

If the parties aren’t able to reach an agreement, the issue will go to trial before the DG Agriculture, European Commission.

Just like the haiku above, we like to keep our posts short and sweet. Hopefully, you found this bite-sized information helpful. If you would like more information, please do not hesitate to contact us here.

Related Articles

Just Because It’s on the Internet Doesn’t Mean It’s “Publicly Accessible”

The Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB or Board) has denied institution of a petition for inter partes review (IPR) because the petitioner failed to ...
Read More

Trademark Denied for “ChatGPT”

The US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) has denied OpenAI’s applications to trademark “ChatGPT” and “GPT.” The Final Office Action states, “Registration is refused because the applied-for mark ...
Read More

Federal Circuit: “Improving User Experience” Isn’t Patentable

The Federal Circuit has affirmed a lower court decision that patent claims for methods and systems for improving how search results are displayed to users ...
Read More

Stay Informed

Sign up to receive Patent Poetry—a monthly roundup of key IP issues in our signature haiku format. Four articles (only 68 syllables); zero hassle.



Artificial Intelligence

Blockchain & Cryptocurrency

Computer Technology & Software

Consumer Electronics

Electrical Devices



Mechanical Devices

Consumer & Retail Products

Hardware & Tools

Toys & Games



Chemical Compounds

Digital Health

Healthcare Products



Books & Publications

Brand Creation

Luxury Products

Photography & Video

Product Design