Public Domain,

Jury Awards $230 Million in Trade Secret Theft Case

Big jury award
For lithography secrets;
Costs are included

A jury in California awarded the US branch of ASML, a Dutch semiconductor company, $233 million in damages after a rival company, XTAL, was found to have misappropriated its trade secrets.

According to The Register,

XTAL was founded by two semiconductor veterans who had worked at Brion Technologies when it was acquired in 2007 by ASML and subsequently left and set up their own company. XTAL specializes in enhancing chip yields during manufacture, designing semiconductors, and similar consultation work.

ASML alleged that XTAL pushed ASML’s employees to steal ASML’s trade secrets and secretly work for XTAL.

Two ASML employees left the company and went to work for XTAL. ASML told the jury at trial that those employees were working for XTAL while they were still on the ASML payroll.

The former employees were accused of copying ASML trade secrets onto external storage devices and failing to return them to their former employer when they left the company.

ASML became suspicious when it lost a contract with a key customer and XTAL entered the market with its own lithography technology, developed at an “astonishing” rate.

Brion is a leader in computational lithography. According to the Recorder,

Computational lithography uses computer models to predict and simulate how microscopic chip patterns will print on physical wafers. 

When the court ordered XTAL to hand over its computer equipment to be searched, information on lithography technology that ASML had acquired from Brion was found.

Former ASML employees were also accused of taking source code, programming language scripts, and business information to XTAL.

The award included $1.2 million for the plaintiff’s investigation expenses.

Under California’s computer fraud statute (Penal Code Section 502), in addition to any other remedies, the owner of a network or data lost or damaged by someone in violation of the statue can recover the costs of investigation.

Related Articles

Do AI content generators violate underlying IP rights?

IP owners sue
AI art generators.
What counts as “fair use”?

Read More

Patent Wars Come to Crypto

Brings lawsuit against Circle
In patent dispute

Read More

Is this the end of the employee non-compete?

FTC issues
A notice of rulemaking
To ban non-competes

Read More

Stay Informed

Sign up to receive Patent Poetry—a monthly roundup of key IP issues in our signature haiku format. Four articles (only 68 syllables); zero hassle.