CALL US: 206.533.3854
CALL US  206.533.3854
https://unsplash.com/photos/JTR6p4NrDCE

Michael Jordan Awarded A "Win" by the Chinese Supreme Court in a Trademark Dispute (part 1)

Michael Jordan is
Triumphant in China’s
Supreme People’s Court

China’s Supreme People’s Court ruled in favor of Michael Jordan in a trademark battle with the Chinese company, Qiaodan Sports, overturning previous rulings against the athlete. The focal point of the litigation being the Chinese company’s use of the Chinese translation of Jordan’s name “Qiaodan”.

After an 8 year-long legal battle, which involved more than 80 lawsuits and counter lawsuits, the Supreme People’s Court of China said that the Chinese firm’s actions have displayed “malicious intent” by registering trademarks for Jordan’s Chinese name.

After years of losing in different courts in China, Jordan has expressed his satisfaction in the Supreme People’s Court’s decision saying (in a statement sent to Reuters), “I am happy that the Supreme People’s Court has recognized the right to protect my name through its ruling in the trademark cases.”

Although as Cissy Zhou of the South China Morning Post has pointed out that the Supreme People’s Court’s ruling was limited. While Jordan’s name is protected by the ruling, the other aspects of his identity are not. But for Michael Jordan, “Chinese consumers deserve to know that Qiaodan Sports and its products have no connection to me.”

(Please stay tuned for the litigation history of this case in our next article)


Just like the haiku above, we like to keep our posts short and sweet. Hopefully, you found this bite-sized information helpful. If you would like more information, please do not hesitate to contact us here.

Related Articles

Federal Circuit Reverses Novartis Patent Decision

The Federal Circuit has issued a precedential decision reversing a lower court’s decision that certain claims of Novartis’s patent for the heart drug Entresto were ...
Read More

Second Circuit Upholds Ed Sheeran’s Win in Copyright Case

The Second Circuit has upheld a lower court’s decision that musician Ed Sheeren didn’t infringe the copyright for Marvin Gaye’s 1973 song “Let’s Get It ...
Read More

Federal Circuit Affirms Patent Non-Infringement Based on Deleted Term

The Federal Circuit has affirmed a judgement of non-infringement of a patent based on a term that appeared in a provisional patent application but was ...
Read More

Let's work together.

Contact us to set up a meeting with an attorney or team member.

Stay Informed

Sign up to receive Patent Poetry—a monthly roundup of key IP issues in our signature haiku format. Four articles (only 68 syllables); zero hassle.

SECTORS

HIGH
TECHNOLOGY

Artificial Intelligence

Blockchain & Cryptocurrency

Computer Technology & Software

Consumer Electronics

Electrical Devices

MECHANICAL
& PRODUCTS​

Cleantech

Mechanical Devices

Consumer & Retail Products

Hardware & Tools

Toys & Games

LIFE SCIENCES
& CHEMISTRY​

Biotechnology

Chemical Compounds

Digital Health

Healthcare Products

Pharmaceuticals

BRANDING
& CREATIVE​

Books & Publications

Brand Creation

Luxury Products

Photography & Video

Product Design

call us  206.533.3854