CALL US: 206.533.3854
CALL US  206.533.3854
AEON Law logo full color transparent
By Robert Delaunay - Source, Public Domain,

New Patent Office Guidelines Affect Fintech Inventions

New patent guidelines
Clarify what is “abstract” –
Such as formulas

The US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) has issued new  guidelines  that may make it easier to patent inventions relating to financial technology (“fintech”).

Fintech inventions have been at high risk of being rejected for being directed to “abstract ideas” under the Supreme Court’s 2014 decision in the case of  Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank Int’l.

Since the Alice decision, the USPTO and the courts have struggled to determine what is and isn’t patentable.

For example, laws of nature, natural phenomena, and “abstract” ideas aren’t patentable.

Under the new guidelines, an invention is only “abstract” if it falls into one of three categories:

  • Mathematical expressions and formulas
  • Methods for organizing humans or human actions
  • Mental processes performed by humans

These things are considered to be the “basic tools of scientific and technological work,” and thus not patent-eligible.

This new guidance may make it easier to draft fintech-related patent applications that pass muster with the USPTO.

In addition, as with all inventions, to be patentable an invention must be new, non-obvious, and described in the patent application in enough detail that someone “skilled in the art” could practice (use) the invention.

As the Federal Register notes,

This guidance does not constitute substantive rulemaking and does not have the force and effect of law. The guidance sets out agency policy with respect to the USPTO’s interpretation of the subject matter eligibility requirements of 35 U.S.C. 101 in view of decisions by the Supreme Court and the Federal Circuit.

The USPTO sought public feedback on the new guidelines and may further revise them in response to this feedback.

Related Articles

Just Because It’s on the Internet Doesn’t Mean It’s “Publicly Accessible”

The Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB or Board) has denied institution of a petition for inter partes review (IPR) because the petitioner failed to ...
Read More

Trademark Denied for “ChatGPT”

The US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) has denied OpenAI’s applications to trademark “ChatGPT” and “GPT.” The Final Office Action states, “Registration is refused because the applied-for mark ...
Read More

Federal Circuit: “Improving User Experience” Isn’t Patentable

The Federal Circuit has affirmed a lower court decision that patent claims for methods and systems for improving how search results are displayed to users ...
Read More

Stay Informed

Sign up to receive Patent Poetry—a monthly roundup of key IP issues in our signature haiku format. Four articles (only 68 syllables); zero hassle.



Artificial Intelligence

Blockchain & Cryptocurrency

Computer Technology & Software

Consumer Electronics

Electrical Devices



Mechanical Devices

Consumer & Retail Products

Hardware & Tools

Toys & Games



Chemical Compounds

Digital Health

Healthcare Products



Books & Publications

Brand Creation

Luxury Products

Photography & Video

Product Design