CALL US: 206.533.3854
CALL US  206.533.3854
Full color aeon logo

Nike Beats Puma’s Dismissal Motion in Shoe Patent Case

Court won’t dismiss case
Over knitted running shoes;
Nike wins for now

In May, Nike sued Puma for alleged infringement of seven of Nike’s footwear-related utility patents.

Nike’s suit was based in part on its Flyknit technology, introduced in 2012, including “a featherweight, form-fitting, and virtually seamless sock-like upper, scientifically tuned to provide areas of support, flexibility, and breathability where athletes need them most.”

The Flyknit technology is covered by more than 300 utility patents.

Nike claimed that Puma’s Proknit shoe infringed the Nike Flyknit patents.

Nike also claimed that Puma’s shoes infringed other Nike patents including the Nike Air technology introduced in 1987 and since covered by more than 800 patents.

Puma argued that the Flyknit patents didn’t cover patentable subject matter and moved to dismiss the case.

The court applied the two-step analytical framework of the US Supreme Court’s decision in Alice Corp. Pty. Ltd. v. CLS Bank Int’l.

Under this test, a court must consider:

  • whether patent claims are directed to one of four categories of patentable subject matter or are only abstract ideas; and
  • if the patent claims are directed to an abstract idea, whether the claims include an “inventive concept” that ensures the patent adds significantly to current practice.

The court found that the Nike patents were directed to patentable subject matter – shoes and their component parts.

The court also found that the patents included “inventive concepts” that increased the efficiency of the shoe knitting process and reduced waste.

The court thus declined Puma’s motion to dismiss.

Although utility patents are more commonly associated with high tech devices, as this case demonstrates there can also be a dense patent thicket around something as seemingly simple as a shoe.

The case is Nike Inc. v. Puma North America Inc., Case No.1:18-cv-10876.

Related Articles

Federal Circuit Allows “Trump Too Small” Trademark

Federal Circuit:
First Amendment allows the
“Trump Too Small” trademark

Read More

When is trademark generic?

Generic trademarks:
Won’t be granted to start with,
And can be cancelled

Read More

AEON Law Founder Named Crypto “Trailblazer” by the National Law Journal

Adam Philipp, the founder of AEON Law, has been recognized among the leading practitioners of blockchain, cryptocurrency, and fintech law by the National Law Journal.

Read More

Stay Informed

Sign up to receive Patent Poetry—a monthly roundup of key IP issues in our signature haiku format. Four articles (only 68 syllables); zero hassle.



International IP Protection