CALL US: 206.533.3854
CALL US  206.533.3854
Smart phone with social apps on screen with notifications

Patent Office Publishes Guidelines on Computer Related Designs

USPTO
Explains patent guidance for
Computer icons

The US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) has published a notice with supplemental guidance for its staff members examining design patent claims that include computer-generated images.

In December 2020, the USPTO sought public input on ‘‘whether its interpretation of the article of manufacture requirement in the United States Code should be revised to protect digital designs that encompass new and emerging technologies.”

In response to public comments, the USPTO determined that the public would benefit from further clarifications to MPEP section 1504.01(a)(I). This provides:

The following guidelines have been developed to assist USPTO personnel in determining whether design patent applications for computer-generated icons comply with the “article of manufacture” requirement of 35 U.S.C. 171.

A. General Principle Governing Compliance With the “Article of Manufacture”Requirement

Computer-generated icons, such as full screen displays and individual icons, are 2- dimensional images which alone are surface ornamentation. See, e.g., Ex parte Strijland, 26 USPQ2d 1259 (Bd. Pat. App. & Int. 1992) (computer-generated icon alone is merely surface ornamentation). The USPTO considers designs for computer-generated icons embodied in articles of manufacture to be statutory subject matter eligible for design patent protection under 35 U.S.C. 171. Thus, if an application claims a computer-generated icon shown on a computer screen, monitor, other display panel, or a portion thereof, the claim complies with the “article of manufacture” requirement of 35 U.S.C. 171. Since a patentable design is inseparable from the object to which it is applied and cannot exist alone merely as a scheme of surface ornamentation, a computer-generated icon must be embodied in a computer screen, monitor, other display panel, or portion thereof, to satisfy 35 U.S.C. 171. See MPEP § 1502.

As the USPTO explains in the notice,

35 U.S.C. 171 provides that ‘‘[w]hoever invents any new, original and ornamental design for an article of manufacture may obtain a patent therefor’’ (emphasis added). The language ‘‘new, original and ornamental design for an article of manufacture’’ set forth in 35 U.S.C. 171 has been interpreted to include at least three kinds of designs:

(1) a design for an ornament, impression, print, or picture that is applied to or embodied in an article of manufacture (surface indicia);
(2) a design for the shape or configuration of an article of manufacture; and
(3) a combination of the first two categories

According to the guidance discussed in the notice, “the mere display of a computer-generated electronic image . . . on a display panel does not constitute statutory subject matter under 35 U.S.C. 171.”

As the notice explains,

The USPTO considers computer icons or GUIs to be two-dimensional images which standing alone are surface ornamentation (i.e., an ornament, impression, print, or picture). See MPEP section 1504.01(a)(I). Therefore, the title and the claim should not be for a computer icon or a GUI alone, but must be for an article of manufacture, for example, a ‘‘display panel with computer icon.’’

However, says the notice,

the USPTO considers a computer icon or a GUI shown on a display panel, or a portion thereof, to be more than a mere display of a picture on a screen because a computer icon or a GUI is an integral and active component in the operation of—i.e., embodied in and/or applied to—a programmed computer displaying the computer icon or the GUI. Therefore, a computer icon or a GUI is eligible under 35 U.S.C. 171, if properly presented and claimed (e.g., the drawing(s) fully discloses the design as embodied in the article of manufacture).

(A GUI is a graphical user interface that allows users to interact with an electronic device via icons and other visual indicators.)

The notice also provides helpful guidance and illustrations on how an icon or GUI can be claimed as part of an article of manufacture.


Just like the haiku above, we like to keep our posts short and sweet. Hopefully, you found this bite-sized information helpful. If you would like more information, please do not hesitate to contact us here.

Related Articles

Federal Circuit: Letter Triggers On-Sale Bar in Patent Case

The Federal Circuit reversed and remanded a district court’s finding that patents were not invalid under the on-sale bar, finding that a letter sent to ...
Read More

Vibes, Trade Dress, and AI

As the New York Times recently reported, one online influencer is suing another, claiming she stole her “vibes.” As the Times explains, The oversize beige ...
Read More

Jury Awards Netlist $118 Million in Second Samsung Patent Infringement Case

A federal jury in Texas has awarded Netlist $118 million in damages for patent infringement by Samsung. Netlist, founded in 2000, is a Delaware company ...
Read More

Let's work together.

Contact us to set up a meeting with an attorney or team member.

Stay Informed

Sign up to receive Patent Poetry—a monthly roundup of key IP issues in our signature haiku format. Four articles (only 68 syllables); zero hassle.

SECTORS

HIGH
TECHNOLOGY

Artificial Intelligence

Blockchain & Cryptocurrency

Computer Technology & Software

Consumer Electronics

Electrical Devices

MECHANICAL
& PRODUCTS​

Cleantech

Mechanical Devices

Consumer & Retail Products

Hardware & Tools

Toys & Games

LIFE SCIENCES
& CHEMISTRY​

Biotechnology

Chemical Compounds

Digital Health

Healthcare Products

Pharmaceuticals

BRANDING
& CREATIVE​

Books & Publications

Brand Creation

Luxury Products

Photography & Video

Product Design

call us  206.533.3854