CALL US: 206.533.3854
CALL US  206.533.3854
AEON Law logo full color transparent
AEON law logo on grey background

Patent Rush

Rush to file patents;
America Invents Act
Makes startups hurry

As reported by the Washington Post, startups are among the companies likely to be the most dramatically affected when the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (AIA) takes effect in March, 2013.  Some predict a gold-rush style “stampede” to the patent office before the Act takes effect.

(A similar “gold rush” happened around 1995, when the patent term changed from 17 years from the date of issue to the current 20 years from the earliest filing date.)

The AIA, which represents the most significant change to the US patent system in 60 years,  will convert the US from a “first to invent” system to a modified “first to file” system.

A pure “first to file” system is used by the European Patent Office, and although the AIA will not completely harmonize the two systems it will bring them closer together.

Some critics have argued that the AIA will harm startup companies by pushing them to bear the expense of filing a patent while they’re still struggling to get off the ground.  A well-prepared patent application can cost from $5,000 to $15,000.

Critics also argue that the AIA gives large companies, which have patent lawyers already on staff, an even greater competitive advantage.

As reported in this blog, technology titans are battling over patent rights on at least four continents:  Oracle and Google are fighting over Android, Yahoo and Facebook are suing each other, etc.  Companies are also buying up patent portfolios belonging to companies like AOL, Motorola, Kodak, and Nortel for both offensive and defensive purposes.

More and more, startups are recognizing the value of investing in patents.  Patents can be used as bargaining chips in negotiations with venture capitalists and can attract potential buyers.  Studies have shown that startups with patents or filed applications attract more venture capital and get it faster.

The existence of a valuable patent portfolio also reduces risk for potential buyers and investors, as patent rights can live on even after a company fails and provide valuable licensing revenue to their owners.

Related Articles

Fourth Circuit Overturns $1 Billion Copyright Infringement Verdict

The Fourth Circuit has overturned a $1 billion verdict in a copyright case against Cox Communications. As the court explained, Defendant Cox Communications sells internet, ...
Read More

Will Federal Circuit Soften Test for Design Patent Obviousness?

An en banc panel of the Federal Circuit recently heard arguments in a case that could change how courts assess design patents for “obviousness.” LKQ ...
Read More

Just Because It’s on the Internet Doesn’t Mean It’s “Publicly Accessible”

The Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB or Board) has denied institution of a petition for inter partes review (IPR) because the petitioner failed to ...
Read More

Let's work together.

Contact us to set up a meeting with an attorney or team member.

Stay Informed

Sign up to receive Patent Poetry—a monthly roundup of key IP issues in our signature haiku format. Four articles (only 68 syllables); zero hassle.

SECTORS

HIGH
TECHNOLOGY

Artificial Intelligence

Blockchain & Cryptocurrency

Computer Technology & Software

Consumer Electronics

Electrical Devices

MECHANICAL
& PRODUCTS​

Cleantech

Mechanical Devices

Consumer & Retail Products

Hardware & Tools

Toys & Games

LIFE SCIENCES
& CHEMISTRY​

Biotechnology

Chemical Compounds

Digital Health

Healthcare Products

Pharmaceuticals

BRANDING
& CREATIVE​

Books & Publications

Brand Creation

Luxury Products

Photography & Video

Product Design

SERVICES

PROTECT

DEAL

DEFEND