CALL US: 206.533.3854
CALL US  206.533.3854
https://www.uspto.gov/patents-application-process/appealing-patent-decisions/trials-ptab

PTAB Judges Lack Experience

Admin law judges
lack experience, compared
to federal ones

The Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) is an administrative tribunal that handles patent matters.

As the US Patent and Trademark Office website says, the  PTAB

conducts trials, including inter partes, post-grant, and covered business method patent reviews and derivation proceedings; hears appeals from adverse examiner decisions in patent applications and reexamination proceedings; and renders decisions in interferences.

Like federal court judges — and specifically the appeals court judges of the federal circuit — PTAB judges can determine whether a patent lives or dies.

However, compared  to federal court judges, PTAB judges are relatively inexperienced.

The  average  age of federal court judges is about 68, according to the Federal Judicial Center. Most have decades of experience before they’re appointed to the federal bench.

91%  of federal judges had at least 15 years of experience when they were appointed to the bench, and 70%  had more than 20 years of experience.

On the other hand, a recent study by Gene Quinn of the IPWatchdog blog  found that PTAB judges have significantly less experience.

He identified 174 PTAB judges via LinkedIn and other sources and created a spreadsheet showing when they went to law school and how many years of experience they had when they were appointed to the PTAB.

He found that the median number of years of experience at the time of appointment was 11 years, with an average of 13 years.

The median number of years of experience for the judges on the PTAB was 17, with the average being 19.

Quinn found that 12.6% of PTAB judges had less than five years of experience.

Thus, some decisions about patent validity are being made by PTAB judges who were law firm associates when they joined the PTAB.

To receive poetic updates on IP law, sign up for our monthly collection of patent haikus and news here:

Related Articles

Buying Rival’s Trademark as Keyword Search Doesn’t Violate Lanham Act

The Ninth Circuit has affirmed a district court’s grant of summary judgment for the defendant in a case in which the plaintiff law firm claimed ...
Read More

What does copyright law have to do with McDonalds ice cream machines?

The US Copyright Office has granted a copyright exemption giving restaurants the right to repair broken equipment by bypassing locks intended to prevent anyone other ...
Read More

What’s Happening with AI and Copyright Law

Not surprisingly, a lot is happening at the intersection of artificial intelligence (AI) and intellectual property (IP) law. Here’s a roundup of some recent developments ...
Read More

Let's work together.

Contact us to set up a meeting with an attorney or team member.

Stay Informed

Sign up to receive Patent Poetry—a monthly roundup of key IP issues in our signature haiku format. Four articles (only 68 syllables); zero hassle.

SECTORS

HIGH
TECHNOLOGY

Artificial Intelligence

Blockchain & Cryptocurrency

Computer Technology & Software

Consumer Electronics

Electrical Devices

MECHANICAL
& PRODUCTS​

Cleantech

Mechanical Devices

Consumer & Retail Products

Hardware & Tools

Toys & Games

LIFE SCIENCES
& CHEMISTRY​

Biotechnology

Chemical Compounds

Digital Health

Healthcare Products

Pharmaceuticals

BRANDING
& CREATIVE​

Books & Publications

Brand Creation

Luxury Products

Photography & Video

Product Design

call us  206.533.3854