CALL US: 206.533.3854
CALL US  206.533.3854
AEON Law logo full color transparent
By The Conmunity - Pop Culture Geek from Los Angeles, CA, USA - San Diego Comic-Con 2011 - DC characters hanging outside the Marvel booth, CC BY 2.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=33401510

San Diego Comic-Con Prevails in Trademark Dispute

San Diego holds
the trademark for “Comic-Con”;
others must license

A jury in San Diego decided in favor of Comic-Con International (CCI), the nonprofit organization that runs the San Diego Comic-Con (SDCC), in a trademark dispute with Dan Farr Productions and Bryan Brandenburg, the organizers of the Salt Lake City Comic Con (SLCC).

CCI has been running the San Diego Comic-Con for almost 50 years. The annual convention attracts more than 140,000 people (many in costume) over its four-day run. Many celebrities attend panels and autograph signings, and many movie studios use the event to premiere trailers and promote their films.

The trademark dispute dates back to 2014, when the promoters of the Salt Lake City convention engaged in promotional activities, including driving an SLCC-branded vehicle through the streets of San Diego during the SDCC.

CCI sent a cease-and-desist letter to Dan Farr Productions, alleging that the company was deliberately trying to confuse consumers about the sponsorship of the two events.

Farr and Brandenburg argued that the term “comic con” was a generic reference to a convention focusing on comic books. They contended that CCI’s trademark only applied to the specific term “Comic-Con” with a hyphen. CCI had filed but withdrawn an application for a trademark for “Comic Con” without a hyphen.

Farr and Brandenburg cited numerous instances where “comic con” was used to describe events before the first SDCC and said that only 1% of consumers were confused about whether the San Diego and Salt Lake City events were related.

At trial, CCI produced evidence that “Comic-Con” was widely recognized to refer only to the San Diego Convention. 70% of respondents to the survey made this association.

Farr and Brandenburg boasted in emails of “hijacking” the fame of SDCC to promote their own event.

However, the jury awarded damages of only $20,000, instead of the $12 million that CCI had sought.

The damages sought included $9 million for an advertising campaign to clear up consumer confusion between the events.

The jury found that although the defendants used the Comic-Con mark without permission, they didn’t infringe “willfully.”

Some other comics-oriented conventions have taken a license to use the Comic-Con mark but others have not. In the wake of the decision, the non-licensed Comic Con’s (and Comic-Con’s) may need to acquire licenses or change their names to avoid trademark infringement claims.

The defendants announced that they planned to appeal.

To receive poetic updates on IP law, sign up for our monthly collection of patent haikus and news here:

Related Articles

Supreme Court: No Time Limit on Monetary Recovery in Copyright Cases

The US Supreme Court has ruled in favor of Sherman Nealy, a record producer who sued Warner Music for copyright infringement over a 2008 song by ...
Read More

Patent Office Requests Public Comment on AI Prior Art

The US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) has published a request for comment (RFC) on “how AI could affect evaluations of how the level of ordinary skills ...
Read More

FTC Bans Employee Non-Compete Agreements

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has voted to approve a proposed rule that would ban employers from using non-compete agreements with nearly all employees. The ...
Read More

Let's work together.

Contact us to set up a meeting with an attorney or team member.

Stay Informed

Sign up to receive Patent Poetry—a monthly roundup of key IP issues in our signature haiku format. Four articles (only 68 syllables); zero hassle.

SECTORS

HIGH
TECHNOLOGY

Artificial Intelligence

Blockchain & Cryptocurrency

Computer Technology & Software

Consumer Electronics

Electrical Devices

MECHANICAL
& PRODUCTS​

Cleantech

Mechanical Devices

Consumer & Retail Products

Hardware & Tools

Toys & Games

LIFE SCIENCES
& CHEMISTRY​

Biotechnology

Chemical Compounds

Digital Health

Healthcare Products

Pharmaceuticals

BRANDING
& CREATIVE​

Books & Publications

Brand Creation

Luxury Products

Photography & Video

Product Design

SERVICES

PROTECT

DEAL

DEFEND