Try Again: USPTO Guidelines Need Further Explanation

Makes a second attempt to
Clarify guidelines

As we previously reported, in March the US Patent and Trademark Office issued new guidelines and training materials for patent examiners to help them determine whether patent claims based on products of nature, natural laws, and natural phenomena may be allowed.

However, a lot of patent attorneys apparently didn’t understand the original examples, so the USPTO is trying again.

“We understand there are some issues where the public maybe misunderstands or didn’t quite get the concepts we were approaching,” said June Cohan of the Office of Patent Legal Administration.

The Patent Office is developing a second round of more in-depth training materials and seeking the public’s input on any aspect of the initial “Laws of Nature/Natural Products Guidance” documents.

The Patent Office is hosting a public forum on May 9 to seek feedback on the documents.

Interested parties may attend in person or via webcast. Beginning at 1:00 p.m. EDT and ending at 4:00 p.m. EDT, the webcast will be available on the Office’s Internet Web site at

According to the USPTO’s announcement:

The forum will provide an opportunity for participants to present their interpretation of the impact of Supreme Court precedent on the complex legal and technical issues involved in subject matter eligibility analyses during patent examination. Participants who believe that the Supreme Court decisions could be implemented in an alternative manner from the approach taken in the Laws of Nature/Natural Products Guidance should use the forum to present their alternative approach and the legal rationale for the alternative. The forum also can be used by participants to suggest additional examples for use by the Office to create a more complete picture of the impact of Supreme Court precedent on subject matter eligibility.

Members of the public may also submit written comments on the new guidelines, whether they are attending the forum or not.

The comments may be sent by email to Registration requests for the forum may also be sent to that email address.

The comments will be available via the USPTO’s Web site at Thus, confidential or private information should not be included in a comment.

Related Articles

Do AI content generators violate underlying IP rights?

IP owners sue
AI art generators.
What counts as “fair use”?

Read More

Patent Wars Come to Crypto

Brings lawsuit against Circle
In patent dispute

Read More

Is this the end of the employee non-compete?

FTC issues
A notice of rulemaking
To ban non-competes

Read More

Stay Informed

Sign up to receive Patent Poetry—a monthly roundup of key IP issues in our signature haiku format. Four articles (only 68 syllables); zero hassle.