CALL US: 206.533.3854
CALL US  206.533.3854

USPTO May Get to Keep Its Money

Senator Feinstein
Introduces bill to let
PTO keep fees

Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) has introduced a bill that would let the US Patent and Trademark Office keep all the fees it collects from patent applicants.  The bill was co-sponsored by Senators Amy Klobuchar (D-MN), Tom Coburn (R-OK), and Jeff Flake (R-AZ).

Currently, these fees can be “diverted” to fund other federal agencies.  Since 1990, more than $1 billion has been diverted.  Senator Feinstein called this a “tax on innovation.”  (We agree.)

The average time needed to secure a patent rose from 18 months in 1991 to 35 months in 2010, according to Feinstein.

The USPTO is self-funded by fees paid by users and receives no taxpayer money.  This gives it limited protection from things like government shutdowns.  However, it’s not permitted to retain all the money it takes in.

Congress has often shifted part of the USPTO’s revenues to other agencies.  In 2013, the Office was required to reduce its budget by $120 million due to sequestration cutbacks, because Congress would not let it use funds it had generated.

Senator Feinstein’s bill is called the Patent Fee Integrity Act.  It would put the USPTO’s income into a separate fund that could only be used by the USPTO.

There would be no limits placed on how the USPTO could spend its “own” money.  However, the Office would need to send its annual spending plan to Congress and would be subject to an independent audit.

Feinstein said in a statement:

If we fail to support the PTO and reduce delays in the patent process, we are contributing to a decline in American ingenuity, and that is something we should all work hard to avoid.

Senator Coburn added:

Instead of letting politicians in Congress raid PTO’s funds to pay for parochial pet projects, lawmakers should ensure that funds raised by patent fees stay at the PTO. Doing so will help shore up the PTO’s finances and alleviate the backlog of hundreds of thousands of potentially job-creating patent applications that are due a review.

A similar bill was introduced in the House of Representatives in October by Representative John Conyers (D-MI).

Related Articles

Buying Rival’s Trademark as Keyword Search Doesn’t Violate Lanham Act

The Ninth Circuit has affirmed a district court’s grant of summary judgment for the defendant in a case in which the plaintiff law firm claimed ...
Read More

What does copyright law have to do with McDonalds ice cream machines?

The US Copyright Office has granted a copyright exemption giving restaurants the right to repair broken equipment by bypassing locks intended to prevent anyone other ...
Read More

What’s Happening with AI and Copyright Law

Not surprisingly, a lot is happening at the intersection of artificial intelligence (AI) and intellectual property (IP) law. Here’s a roundup of some recent developments ...
Read More

Let's work together.

Contact us to set up a meeting with an attorney or team member.

Stay Informed

Sign up to receive Patent Poetry—a monthly roundup of key IP issues in our signature haiku format. Four articles (only 68 syllables); zero hassle.

SECTORS

HIGH
TECHNOLOGY

Artificial Intelligence

Blockchain & Cryptocurrency

Computer Technology & Software

Consumer Electronics

Electrical Devices

MECHANICAL
& PRODUCTS​

Cleantech

Mechanical Devices

Consumer & Retail Products

Hardware & Tools

Toys & Games

LIFE SCIENCES
& CHEMISTRY​

Biotechnology

Chemical Compounds

Digital Health

Healthcare Products

Pharmaceuticals

BRANDING
& CREATIVE​

Books & Publications

Brand Creation

Luxury Products

Photography & Video

Product Design

call us  206.533.3854