CALL US: 206.533.3854
CALL US  206.533.3854
AEON Law logo full color transparent
By Tim Evanson from Washington, D.C., USA, United States of America - USPTO-Alexandria-2011-03-12_a, CC BY-SA 2.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=37051960

USPTO Releases Latest Updates on Patent Subject Matter Eligibility

USPTO
Updates subject matter guide,
Helps examiners

The United States Patent Office (USPTO) recently issued its latest update to its guidelines on patent subject matter eligibility.

These guidelines help patent examiners decide whether or not the claims of a patent applicable describe an invention that’s actually eligible for a patent.

Under 35 U.S.C. §101,

Whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof, may obtain a patent therefor, subject to the conditions and requirements of this title.

That seemingly simple statement has generated hundreds of thousands (perhaps millions) of pages of legal briefs and court decisions.

USPTO updates are based on recent decisions by the US Supreme Court and the Federal Circuit on subject matter eligibility. The USPTO also takes into account public comments on prior editions of the updates. The last version was issued in July of 2015.

According to the executive summary of the new guidelines, when a patent examiner finds that a claim is directed to an illegible abstract idea, the examiner’s rejection should identify the specific abstract idea at issue.

When a claim is directed to an ineligible law of nature or natural phenomenon, the rejection should also identify this.

The guidelines don’t have the force of law, but they’re sometimes useful for patent lawyers and patent applicants in trying to predict what types of claims will and won’t be accepted, and in helping to draft claims that are more likely to pass muster.

In response to a rejection, an applicant may:

  • Amend a claim (for example, add additional elements or modify existing elements)
  • Present persuasive arguments or evidence why the rejection was in error

Comments on the latest version of the guidelines can be sent to: 2014_interim_guidance@uspto.gov

Related Articles

Tennessee Passes Law Against AI Voice Copies

The state of Tennessee has passed a law against the use of artificial intelligence (AI) to copy a person’s voice. The law, signed on March ...
Read More

Bill Proposes IP Protection for Golf Courses

Congressmen Brian Fitzpatrick (R-PA) and Jimmy Panetta (D-CA) have introduced the Bolstering Intellectual Rights against Digital Infringement Enhancement (a.k.a. the BIRDIE Act), which proposes amending ...
Read More

Patent and Trademark Offices Publish Study on NFT IP Issues

The US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the Copyright Office have published the results of their joint study on non-fungible tokens (NFTs) and intellectual property (IP). ...
Read More

Let's work together.

Contact us to set up a meeting with an attorney or team member.

Stay Informed

Sign up to receive Patent Poetry—a monthly roundup of key IP issues in our signature haiku format. Four articles (only 68 syllables); zero hassle.

SECTORS

HIGH
TECHNOLOGY

Artificial Intelligence

Blockchain & Cryptocurrency

Computer Technology & Software

Consumer Electronics

Electrical Devices

MECHANICAL
& PRODUCTS​

Cleantech

Mechanical Devices

Consumer & Retail Products

Hardware & Tools

Toys & Games

LIFE SCIENCES
& CHEMISTRY​

Biotechnology

Chemical Compounds

Digital Health

Healthcare Products

Pharmaceuticals

BRANDING
& CREATIVE​

Books & Publications

Brand Creation

Luxury Products

Photography & Video

Product Design

SERVICES

PROTECT

DEAL

DEFEND