CALL US: 206.533.3854
CALL US  206.533.3854
By Nick - originally posted to Flickr as Almeria, CC BY 2.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=8185224

Westerns, Software, and “Scènes à Faire”

Copying software
isn’t always infringement
under “scènes à faire”

The Federal Circuit recently upheld a lower court decision that the verbatim copying of lines of software code was permitted under the “scènes à faire” doctrine in copyright law.

Cisco Systems sued Arista Networks for copyright infringement.

Arista copied Cisco’s command-line user interface (“CLI”) program to configure Arista’s own technologies. Arista copied verbatim 500 of Cisco’s multi-line commands.

Software, like other “works of authorship,” including books, movies, architectural drawings, and music, is usually protected by copyright law. Under most circumstances, therefore, copying of software without the owner’s permission would be considered infringement.

However, under the “scènes à faire” doctrine, works that might otherwise be protected under copyright law aren’t.

The “scènes à faire” doctrine was originally applied in the context of dramatic works like novels, plays, and movies.

Dramatic works in certain genres use many of the same conventions or tropes.

For example, Westerns often involve lone gunslingers, evil cattle barons, dance hall girls with hearts of gold, and shoot-outs on main street. It would be problematic for one author to claim “ownership” of such common elements and deprive other authors of the right to use them.

In the Cisco case, the district court found that Arista was “constrained by functionality and preexisting network industry protocols.” In other words, the copied elements had become “stock” and were no more entitled to copyright protection than a generic saloon fight.

Arista was backed by an amicus brief from the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) which made the following points:

First, where the collection of commands in question is simply a group of standard, highly functional commands, arranged based on logic and industry standards, it shouldn’t be copyrightable at all. Second, any copyright that does exist must be sharply limited, as a matter of law and good practical policy. Without such limits, the software industries will find themselves embroiled in the same elaborate and expensive cross-licensing arrangements we see in the patent space and/or face an explosion of litigation. Either option will discourage innovation and competition.

The decision is good news for those in the software field who build on the works of others for purposes such as interoperability.

The case is Cisco Systems v. Arista.

To receive poetic updates on IP law, sign up for our monthly collection of patent haikus and news here:

Related Articles

The US Patent System Is in Crisis – And May Soon Get Worse

Things are in chaos,
Due to DOGE “efficiency.”
Is worse yet to come?
Read More

Is Elon Musk Reading Your Patent Application?

DOGE now has access
To US government docs --
Including patents?
Read More

Copyright Office Says AI Prompts Don’t Confer Authorship

The US Copyright Office has released part two of its Artificial Intelligence (AI) Report. Part one was published in July of 2024 and focused on ...
Read More

Let's work together.

Contact us to set up a meeting with an attorney or team member.

Stay Informed

Sign up to receive Patent Poetry—a monthly roundup of key IP issues in our signature haiku format. Four articles (only 68 syllables); zero hassle.

SECTORS

HIGH
TECHNOLOGY

Artificial Intelligence

Blockchain & Cryptocurrency

Computer Technology & Software

Consumer Electronics

Electrical Devices

MECHANICAL
& PRODUCTS​

Cleantech

Mechanical Devices

Consumer & Retail Products

Hardware & Tools

Toys & Games

LIFE SCIENCES
& CHEMISTRY​

Biotechnology

Chemical Compounds

Digital Health

Healthcare Products

Pharmaceuticals

BRANDING
& CREATIVE​

Books & Publications

Brand Creation

Luxury Products

Photography & Video

Product Design

call us  206.533.3854