CALL US: 206.533.3854
CALL US  206.533.3854
AEON Law logo full color transparent
By Internet Archive Book Images - book page:, No restrictions,

Even Canadian Trademark Applicants Need US Lawyers

Canadians must
Hire US trademark lawyers:

As we previously reported, the US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) recently issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking announcing that foreign applicants will no longer be able to represent themselves before the USPTO and Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB).

As of August 2019, that new rule is now in effect.

Under the new rule, 37 C.F.R. § 11.14(c)(2), “Individuals who are not attorneys are not recognized to practice before the Office in trademark and other non-patent matters…”

Foreign lawyers can register trademarks in the US under limited circumstances:

Any foreign attorney or agent not a resident of the United States who shall file a written application for reciprocal recognition under paragraph (f) of this section and prove to the satisfaction of the OED Director that he or she is registered or in good standing before the patent or trademark office of the country in which he or she resides and practices and is possessed of good moral character and reputation, may be recognized for the limited purpose of representing parties located in such country before the Office in the presentation and prosecution of trademark matters, provided:  the patent or trademark office of such country allows substantially reciprocal privileges to those permitted to practice in trademark matters before the Office.

Only Canadian patent attorneys and agents have been reciprocally recognized so far.

However, if a Canadian attorney is representing someone before the USPTO or TTAB, a qualified US trademark attorney must also be appointed to file documents with the USPTO and correspond with the USPTO.

As we explained before, this rule change came about because of the boom in foreign trademark filings – from 19% in 2015 to 26% in 2017. 44% of those filings in 2017 were by foreign applicants who filed pro se (without a lawyer), and many filings were of low quality, with missing or erroneous information, swamping the resources of the USPTO and clogging up the system.

Just like the haiku above, we like to keep our posts short and sweet. Hopefully, you found this bite-sized information helpful. If you would like more information, please do not hesitate to contact us here.

Related Articles

Supreme Court: No Time Limit on Monetary Recovery in Copyright Cases

The US Supreme Court has ruled in favor of Sherman Nealy, a record producer who sued Warner Music for copyright infringement over a 2008 song by ...
Read More

Patent Office Requests Public Comment on AI Prior Art

The US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) has published a request for comment (RFC) on “how AI could affect evaluations of how the level of ordinary skills ...
Read More

FTC Bans Employee Non-Compete Agreements

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has voted to approve a proposed rule that would ban employers from using non-compete agreements with nearly all employees. The ...
Read More

Let's work together.

Contact us to set up a meeting with an attorney or team member.

Stay Informed

Sign up to receive Patent Poetry—a monthly roundup of key IP issues in our signature haiku format. Four articles (only 68 syllables); zero hassle.



Artificial Intelligence

Blockchain & Cryptocurrency

Computer Technology & Software

Consumer Electronics

Electrical Devices



Mechanical Devices

Consumer & Retail Products

Hardware & Tools

Toys & Games



Chemical Compounds

Digital Health

Healthcare Products



Books & Publications

Brand Creation

Luxury Products

Photography & Video

Product Design