CALL US: 206.533.3854
CALL US  206.533.3854

CALL US: 206.533.3854

SECTORS

HIGH
TECHNOLOGY

Artificial Intelligence

Blockchain & Cryptocurrency

Computer Technology & Software

Consumer Electronics

Electrical Devices

MECHANICAL
& PRODUCTS​

Cleantech

Mechanical Devices

Consumer & Retail Products

Hardware & Tools

Toys & Games

LIFE SCIENCES
& CHEMISTRY​

Biotechnology

Chemical Compounds

Digital Health

Healthcare Products

Pharmaceuticals

BRANDING
& CREATIVE​

Books & Publications

Brand Creation

Luxury Products

Photography & Video

Product Design

"Ghibli museum" by 氷鷺 at Japanese Wikipedia is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.

Studio Ghibli and other Japanese Companies Protest AI Training

Ghibli and others
Object to work being used
To train AI tools

The Verge has reported that

The Content Overseas Distribution Association (CODA), an anti-piracy organization representing Japanese IP holders like Studio Ghibli and Bandai Namco, released a letter last week asking OpenAI to stop using its members’ content to train Sora 2, as reported by Automaton. The letter states that “CODA considers that the act of replication during the machine learning process may constitute copyright infringement,” since the resulting AI model went on to spit out content with copyrighted characters.

Japan’s government formally asked OpenAI to stop replicating Japanese artwork.

As The Verge noted,

This isn’t the first time one of OpenAI’s apps clearly pulled from Japanese media, either — the highlight of GPT-4o’s launch back in March was a proliferation of “Ghibli-style” images. Even Sam Altman’s own profile picture on X is currently a portrait in a style reminiscent of Studio Ghibli.

One user on X (formerly known as Twitter) said about this:

The whole Studio Ghibli AI trend honestly gives me second-hand embarrassment knowing how hard Hayao Miyazaki has fought to retain the identity of his films and how many of you are this willing to make a farce out of decades of artistry because you don’t actually value it.

OpenAI later released a System Card stating:

The model can generate images that resemble the aesthetics of some artists’ work when their name is used in the prompt. This has raised important questions and concerns within the creative community. In response, we opted to take a conservative approach with this version of 4o image generation, as we learn more about how 4o image generation is used by the creative community. We added a refusal which triggers when a user attempts to generate an image in the style of a living artist.

We recently published a blog about Sora. As we wrote, the Wall Street Journal reported in September that

OpenAI is planning to release a new version of its Sora video generator that creates videos featuring copyright material unless copyright holders opt out of having their work appear…

According to The Verge,

Altman announced last month that OpenAI will be changing Sora’s opt-out policy for IP holders, but CODA claims that the use of an opt-out policy to begin with may have violated Japanese copyright law, stating, “under Japan’s copyright system, prior permission is generally required for the use of copyrighted works, and there is no system allowing one to avoid liability for infringement through subsequent objections.”

Copyright only protects works of authorship – not “style.” However, artists have argued that generative AI tools not only infringe their copyright but also violate their trademarks when such tools copy their distinctive styles.

As Fashion Industry Law explained about a case involving Stable Diffusion,

The visual artists-plaintiffs claimed that the style of their artworks is a form of trade dress protected by federal trademark law under the Lanham Act. Their complaint noted specific features of their respective works that represent their unique styles. The plaintiffs alleged that the defendants’ use of “CLIP-guided diffusion” technology in a trade dress database, where the artists’ names are used in prompts to generate trade dress output, is likely to confuse the public with the artists’ trade dress because of their similarity. 

The Hollywood Reporter noted about the Stable Diffusion case that

The court also stressed that Midjourney produced images similar to artists’ works when their names were used as prompts. This, along with claims that the company published images that incorporate plaintiffs’ names on its site showcasing the capability of its tool, served as the basis for allowing trademark claims to move forward. It said that whether a consumer would be misled by Stability’s actions into believing that artists endorsed its product can be tested at a later stage of the case.


Just like the haiku above, we like to keep our posts short and sweet. Hopefully, you found this bite-sized information helpful. If you would like more information, please do not hesitate to contact us here: https://aeonlaw.com/contact-us/.

Related Articles

Google Wins Federal Circuit Reversal on Bot Patent Claims

The Federal Circuit has reversed a decision by the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB or Board) finding that Google had failed to prove one ...
Read More

Federal Circuit Considers “Ordinary Observer” Perspective for Design Patents

The Federal Circuit has vacated a design patent infringement ruling after finding that the district court erred in construing the claim term “transparency” as equivalent ...
Read More

Federal Circuit Affirms Non-Infringement by Heart Valves

Federal Circuit
Affirms lower court judgment
On heart valve patents
Read More

Let's work together.

Contact us to set up a meeting with an attorney or team member.

Stay Informed

Sign up to receive Patent Poetry—a monthly roundup of key IP issues in our signature haiku format. Four articles (only 68 syllables); zero hassle.

SECTORS

HIGH
TECHNOLOGY

Artificial Intelligence

Blockchain & Cryptocurrency

Computer Technology & Software

Consumer Electronics

Electrical Devices

MECHANICAL
& PRODUCTS​

Cleantech

Mechanical Devices

Consumer & Retail Products

Hardware & Tools

Toys & Games

LIFE SCIENCES
& CHEMISTRY​

Biotechnology

Chemical Compounds

Digital Health

Healthcare Products

Pharmaceuticals

BRANDING
& CREATIVE​

Books & Publications

Brand Creation

Luxury Products

Photography & Video

Product Design

call us  206.533.3854