CALL US: 206.533.3854
CALL US  206.533.3854

US Ships in International Waters are Subject to US Patent Act

COURT RULES PATENT ACT
APPLIES TO US-FLAGGED SHIPS
SAILING THE HIGH SEAS

A federal court judge in landlocked Minnesota ruled that the US Patent Act applied to a case of alleged patent infringement occurring on US-flagged ships in international waters.

The case involved a dispute between two companies that responded to a request for proposals from a Brazilian company for a pneumatic conveyance system for transporting oil well waste from oil rigs.

The Brazilian subsidiary of Dynamic Air, Inc. got the contract.

The other company, plaintiff M-I Drilling Fluids UK, Ltd. alleged that Dynamic either installed or directed the installation of a system on US-flagged ships that infringed M-I’s patents.

M-I alleged infringement of five patents “directed to methods, systems, and apparatuses used for collecting, conveying, transporting, and storing . . . drill cuttings, in an environmentally safe way.”

Dynamic moved to dismiss the case.

Under US law, patent holders have the

right to exclude others from making, using, offering for sale, or selling the [patented] invention throughout the United States or importing the invention into the United States.

(Emphasis added.)

Thus, in general US law doesn’t govern infringement of US patents that occurs outside the territorial limits of the US.

However, under the “law of the flag” doctrine in maritime law,

a merchant ship is part of the territory of the country whose flag she flies, and … actions aboard that ship are subject to the laws of the flag state.

Although Congress did not explicitly authorize the application of US patent law to US-flagged ships in international waters, the court found that the legislative history of the Patent Act, as well as an 1865 Massachusetts case, supported this application of the law.

The court thus denied the defendant’s motion to dismiss.

The case is M-I Drilling Fluids UK Ltd., v. Dynamic Air, Inc.

Related Articles

When is a patented product sold “within the United States”?

When is a product
“sold in the United States”?
It’s complicated.

Read More

Do AI content generators violate underlying IP rights?

IP owners sue
AI art generators.
What counts as “fair use”?

Read More

Patent Wars Come to Crypto

Veritaseum
Brings lawsuit against Circle
In patent dispute

Read More

Stay Informed

Sign up to receive Patent Poetry—a monthly roundup of key IP issues in our signature haiku format. Four articles (only 68 syllables); zero hassle.

SECTORS

HIGH
TECHNOLOGY

Artificial Intelligence

Blockchain & Cryptocurrency

Computer Technology & Software

Consumer Electronics

Electrical Devices

MECHANICAL
& PRODUCTS​

Cleantech

Mechanical Devices

Consumer & Retail Products

Hardware & Tools

Toys & Games

LIFE SCIENCES
& CHEMISTRY​

Biotechnology

Chemical Compounds

Digital Health

Healthcare Products

Pharmaceuticals

BRANDING
& CREATIVE​

Books & Publications

Brand Creation

Luxury Products

Photography & Video

Product Design