CALL US: 206.533.3854
CALL US  206.533.3854
AEON Law logo full color transparent
Top Secret Stamp, NDA, Nondisclosure - https://pixabay.com/photos/secret-top-stamp-spy-army-3037639/

Can an NDA Block a PTAB Review?

Sneaky NDAs
Can prevent patent review
By PTAB

Many patent owners and potential licensees enter into non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) at an early stage of discussions.

These agreements may be either unilateral or mutual, and are intended to protect the disclosing party or parties from unauthorized disclosure or misuse of their confidential information.

NDAs generally have very limited scope – simply protecting information. However, a pair of recent cases suggest that they could be used strategically to block a review of the patent by the Patent and Trademark Appeals Board (PTAB).

In Dodocase VR, Inc. v. Merchsource, LLC the Federal Circuit held that a forum selection clause in a patent license can divest the PTAB of jurisdiction.

In Dodocase, the license included a no-challenge clause and a forum selection clause, as follows:

6.4 MerchSource shall not (a) attempt to challenge the validity or enforceability of the Licensed IP; or (b) directly or indirectly, knowingly assist any Third Party in an attempt to challenge the validity or enforceability of the Licensed IP except to comply with any court order or subpoena.

13.4 The laws of the State of California shall govern any dispute arising out of or under this Agreement, notwithstanding the conflict of laws principles of the State of California . . . THE PARTIES AGREE THAT THE SUBJECT MATTER AND PERSONAL JURISDICTION ARE PROPER IN THE COURTS LOCATED IN SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY OR ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA AND THAT DISPUTES SHALL BE LITIGATED BEFORE THE COURTS IN SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY OR ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.

MerchSource informed Dodocase that it would no longer pay royalties under the license because it believed the patent claims were invalid. MerchSource then filed petitions requesting inter partes review (IPR) of the patents at issue.

Dodocase asserted that the IPR breached the no-challenge and forum-selection clauses in the license.

The Federal Circuit agreed with a district court that the PTAB proceedings were included in matters “arising out of or under this Agreement.”

Now for the next case….

In NuCurrent Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Ltd. et al., NuCurrent claimed that a forum-selection clause in an NDA prohibited Samsung from initiating IPR proceedings before the PTAB.

This motion was denied, because the forum selection clause in the NDA wasn’t drafted to explicitly survive the expiration or termination of the NDA, and the NDA had already expired.

However, the district court noted:

the text of the forum selection clause warrants a broad interpretation. The clause provides that “any . . . proceeding . . . relating to . . . the transactions contemplated [by this Agreement] must be instituted exclusively in a [New York] court.” Under New York law, the phrase “relating to” is broader in scope than constructions such as “arising out of.” … Moreover, the clause applies not only to proceedings relating to the NDA, but also to “the transactions contemplated” thereby. (Emphasis added)

Bottom Line

Artful (sneaky?) drafting of an NDA could bar a patent license – or potentially even a party than never entered into a patent license! – from later challenging the validity of the patent in an IPR.

Potential patent licensees should be on the lookout for language like this when patent owners ask them to sign NDAs.

Related Articles

AEON Law Founder Adam Philipp Ranked Among Leading IP Lawyers in Chambers USA Guide

AEON Law founder Adam Philipp is included in this year’s Chambers USA guide of the leading IP attorneys in AEON’s home market of Washington. Based ...
Read More

AEON Law and Founder Adam Philipp Ranked Among World’s Top Patent Professionals in IAM Guide

AEON Law and founder Adam Philipp are recognized in this year’s IAM Patent 1000: The World’s Leading Patent Professionals. Adam was recommended for patent prosecution ...
Read More

Understanding the Dawn Donut Rule for Trademarks

In trademark law, the general rule is that, where two parties seek to use the same trademark in the same geographic area, the earlier (“senior”) ...
Read More

Let's work together.

Contact us to set up a meeting with an attorney or team member.

Stay Informed

Sign up to receive Patent Poetry—a monthly roundup of key IP issues in our signature haiku format. Four articles (only 68 syllables); zero hassle.

SECTORS

HIGH
TECHNOLOGY

Artificial Intelligence

Blockchain & Cryptocurrency

Computer Technology & Software

Consumer Electronics

Electrical Devices

MECHANICAL
& PRODUCTS​

Cleantech

Mechanical Devices

Consumer & Retail Products

Hardware & Tools

Toys & Games

LIFE SCIENCES
& CHEMISTRY​

Biotechnology

Chemical Compounds

Digital Health

Healthcare Products

Pharmaceuticals

BRANDING
& CREATIVE​

Books & Publications

Brand Creation

Luxury Products

Photography & Video

Product Design

call us  206.533.3854

SERVICES

PROTECT

DEAL

DEFEND