CALL US: 206.533.3854
CALL US  206.533.3854
AEON Law logo full color transparent

Continued Sales Are Willful Infringement

Court allows plaintiff
To amend patent complaint
In Rosetta case

A federal district court in Massachusetts has allowed a plaintiff in a patent case to amend its complaint to add a claim of willful infringement for acts of infringement performed after the defendant was served with the complaint.

Plaintiff Englishtown is a company doing business in Cambridge, Massachusetts that was formed in 1996 to develop an interactive online product for teaching students foreign languages. Its primary teaching method used “pair games” in which students learned by playing interactive games with each other.

Defendant Rosetta Stone is a company that does business in Arlington, Virginia. It creates and sells language-learning products and services, including many that are offered online.

Englishtown claims that Rosetta Stone is infringing two of its patents for a system and method for teaching online educational courses over a network. The patents at issue are U.S. Patent No. 6,741,833, issued in 2004, “Learning Activity Platform and Method for Teaching a

Foreign Language over a Network” and U.S. Patent No. 7,058,354 issued in June, 2006. The ‘354 Patent is a continuation of the ‘833 Patent.

Englishtown filed suit in April, 2012 and then moved to file an amended complaint in March, 2013 seeking to add claims for indirect infringement and willful infringement of the ‘354 patent.

To prevail on a claim of willful infringement, the patent holder must prove that: (1) the accused infringer “acted despite an objectively high likelihood that its actions constituted infringement of a valid patent”; and (2) this objectively defined risk was either known or so obvious that

the accused infringer should have known about it.

Englishtown alleged that Rosetta Stone had willfully infringed the ‘354 patent because it continued to sell infringing products despite learning of the ‘354 patent via Englishtown’s complaint.

The court agreed to allow the amendment.

The case is Englishtown, Inc. v. Rosetta Stone Inc., Case No. 12-10636-NMG (D. Mass. July 25, 2013).

Related Articles

Patent and Trademark Offices Publish Study on NFT IP Issues

The US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the Copyright Office have published the results of their joint study on non-fungible tokens (NFTs) and intellectual property (IP). ...
Read More

Fourth Circuit Overturns $1 Billion Copyright Infringement Verdict

The Fourth Circuit has overturned a $1 billion verdict in a copyright case against Cox Communications. As the court explained, Defendant Cox Communications sells internet, ...
Read More

Will Federal Circuit Soften Test for Design Patent Obviousness?

An en banc panel of the Federal Circuit recently heard arguments in a case that could change how courts assess design patents for “obviousness.” LKQ ...
Read More

Let's work together.

Contact us to set up a meeting with an attorney or team member.

Stay Informed

Sign up to receive Patent Poetry—a monthly roundup of key IP issues in our signature haiku format. Four articles (only 68 syllables); zero hassle.

SECTORS

HIGH
TECHNOLOGY

Artificial Intelligence

Blockchain & Cryptocurrency

Computer Technology & Software

Consumer Electronics

Electrical Devices

MECHANICAL
& PRODUCTS​

Cleantech

Mechanical Devices

Consumer & Retail Products

Hardware & Tools

Toys & Games

LIFE SCIENCES
& CHEMISTRY​

Biotechnology

Chemical Compounds

Digital Health

Healthcare Products

Pharmaceuticals

BRANDING
& CREATIVE​

Books & Publications

Brand Creation

Luxury Products

Photography & Video

Product Design

SERVICES

PROTECT

DEAL

DEFEND