CALL US: 206.533.3854
CALL US  206.533.3854
By Anthony92931 - Own work, CC BY-SA 3.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=23093504

When Can US Trademark Law Apply outside the US?

Trader Joe’s market
Gets chance to make trademark case
against copycat

For the most part, US intellectual property laws apply only inside the territorial boundaries of the US.

There are some rare exceptions. For example, as we blogged about previously, US patent law can apply to cases of infringement on US-flagged ships in international waters.

The recent case of Trader Joe’s v. Hallatt shows how US trademark law can also apply to acts outside the US.

The defendant in the case, Norman Hallatt, bought large quantities of Trader Joe’s products at a store in Washington State several times per week, brought them across the border to Canada, and resold them in a store that he called “Pirate Joe’s” and designed to look like a Trader Joe’s store.

Trader Joe’s complained that:

Hallatt sells perishable goods at Pirate Joe’s that he does not transport or store in a manner consistent with the strict quality control standards used by Trader Joe’s. Trader Joe’s has received at least one complaint from a consumer who became sick after eating a Trader Joe’s-branded product she purchased from Pirate Joe’s.

Trader Joe’s tried to stop selling to Hallat, but he began donning disguises and driving to more distant branches of the store.

Trader Joe’s sued Hallat for unfair competition and trademark infringement. A federal district court dismissed the claim for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction, finding that Hallat’s allegedly infringing activities took place in Canada and that Trader Joe’s had failed to show how Hallat’s acts affected US commerce.

On appeal, the 9th Circuit concluded that Trader Joe’s had alleged a “nexus” between Hallat’s actions and US commerce sufficient to warrant extraterritorial application of the Lanham Act (which governs federal trademark cases).

Specifically, Trader Joe’s had argued that Hallat’s transporting goods without proper quality controls to Canada had harmed Trader Joe’s reputation and decreased the value of its US trademarks.

The case was remanded back to the district court for further proceedings.

Takeaway

As this case shows, in some cases US trademark law can help US trademark owners seek remedies in US courts for activities that happen outside the US.

Related Articles

When is a patented product sold “within the United States”?

When is a product
“sold in the United States”?
It’s complicated.

Read More

Do AI content generators violate underlying IP rights?

IP owners sue
AI art generators.
What counts as “fair use”?

Read More

Patent Wars Come to Crypto

Veritaseum
Brings lawsuit against Circle
In patent dispute

Read More

Stay Informed

Sign up to receive Patent Poetry—a monthly roundup of key IP issues in our signature haiku format. Four articles (only 68 syllables); zero hassle.

SECTORS

HIGH
TECHNOLOGY

Artificial Intelligence

Blockchain & Cryptocurrency

Computer Technology & Software

Consumer Electronics

Electrical Devices

MECHANICAL
& PRODUCTS​

Cleantech

Mechanical Devices

Consumer & Retail Products

Hardware & Tools

Toys & Games

LIFE SCIENCES
& CHEMISTRY​

Biotechnology

Chemical Compounds

Digital Health

Healthcare Products

Pharmaceuticals

BRANDING
& CREATIVE​

Books & Publications

Brand Creation

Luxury Products

Photography & Video

Product Design